IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] On why point and APIs formats matter (Re: Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST")

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 12 March 2015 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DC51A00DB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hAVuuBbnWcx3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com [96.6.114.112]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8351A0070 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id D961D48821; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:42:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC9F4881E; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:42:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cas1.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.30]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF531E080; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:42:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:42:01 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.132]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.132]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:42:00 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "Watson Ladd (watsonbladd@gmail.com)" <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] On why point and APIs formats matter (Re: Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST")
Thread-Index: AdBcuVo79uWmO7i6+UWC3FJFBOUN5QAVP20AAAaMOpA=
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:42:00 +0000
Message-ID: <12d063bac3f24fb0838a3b810fea9b73@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <20150312114032.6463568.23668.27363@certicom.com> <20150312164857.GV7286@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20150312164857.GV7286@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.31]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/PWijft-V_PBHEkUaPY0Qc4Bo0fU>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] On why point and APIs formats matter (Re: Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG -> was RE: On "non-NIST")
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:42:04 -0000

+1 to what Nico and Watson wrote.

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: rsalz@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email