Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.txt
Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Sat, 20 February 2016 01:53 UTC
Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8319F1B37EE for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DV60umueEKLV for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 417BC1B37EC for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id s68so37838061qkh.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ysqcx2Dg7JUMVdWzwcbDHMZ4oHvPBKa7/8dopOVnWyQ=; b=u8MF5ucxsSdUdRgLvZxCyQnTRXomXRlOO8NI2r9v5gPxV9gCPi/+EgNBRxNATl3t0h amk8hh3SzMcD2LOpWH5qSoGW72zBtXZliBtXNYGJONmEMvB9RequB/86EFYXCUAeM0D8 gZgSXBWl07yzZJE0mhtapu3PDRcq8qa49P+ySXl1/f3MbL5IGZ5zsJjIV7sQDLsi9LRC opHB4cpIZunw/ZZSpFO/98dfbIX+F8dRI/kkThWo+s7j1fb3h649uhUNylRir9VBZBTB SfAfxsaAeh8sYH6AIJ7KLOF+5kvE+759yFGbgKhFwh8757OjhXG2kcUBh4Xuvprboogc gmoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ysqcx2Dg7JUMVdWzwcbDHMZ4oHvPBKa7/8dopOVnWyQ=; b=JxGelh7jLSJN/19DjVuitpgZe25QGi81/Afxs6va2g+wkY591KOdlhYVSFcuuMd+gr VObiThHhwehGslct8mr0CeUZrR0qxjmQKw+tj8h05KE/76nPXLNyDoBvnCXNGmlWMzRC OyRzruboi/S6Gjglp0xlL7abLh+HLqgxGOgm8KYXWNzO2xUlNCvC4nFOa/U9mlQt5Zto i0xFq3uxZSb7Ef68o0h0gbq8M1q4BP4hPkc0JNR79Sanlaf9oTail7dNSilM5u8dTv3z DAlL++oDZ3ne1EWFKldUagncUSt8uOWpPb6ddJxv5q0NSUWbqCDVzKH3Ufdw0cYKlbd7 tCvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORr0E/NjIQtE+dwPDdBmXgEm6pyfiyT4Y8KciqXxLR7bhOj4/pzSREVqNfifAj0/3l/3x+A/B9eZWSd2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.74.86 with SMTP id x83mr20156294qka.89.1455933215468; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:35 -0800 (PST)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.89.176 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <na713j$kqr$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20160215145643.14144.52226.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56C1FB64.1080309@mit.edu> <na713j$kqr$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:53:35 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wdfGmibxvK-I8Lr4O-AHmJFaElg
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9WiuTSHBQRdpQ+qY8LsY3z1i8w=ndE2EvMPUYmKLZeg-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/YtDn-1zQeX4xGCTGMMoYcD-l8H4>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.txt
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:53:37 -0000
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com> wrote: > OOI, why not use HKDF, with the string as the IKM? Personally, I'd much > prefer that to inventing Yet Another Ad-Hoc Way To Extract Arbitrary- > Length Randomness. The advantage of iterating SHA-256 is that it's trivial to do, including in SAGE. This is only for parameter generation, it's not part of the protocol. HKDF would be overkill. Cheers AGL -- Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org
- [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.… Greg Hudson
- Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.… Alex Elsayed
- Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.… Alex Elsayed
- Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-03.… Adam Langley