IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cfrg] Fwd: Request for comments on GOST documents

David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com> Wed, 02 September 2009 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B62F3A68D8 for <cfrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RO0SbUC3gZ35 for <cfrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4813A6781 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPRTnkqrR7PE/2dsb2JhbADDR4hBAZBiBYQb
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,319,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="236477179"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2009 18:19:29 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n82IJTb0003530; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:19:29 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n82IJTED011595; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:19:29 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:19:28 -0700
Received: from dhcp-128-107-105-98.cisco.com ([128.107.105.98]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:19:28 -0700
Message-Id: <1A53530E-EA36-4ED5-ACF4-E4D7C88C4C45@cisco.com>
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
To: cfrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:19:27 -0700
References: <4A9DF21E.3020801@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2009 18:19:28.0572 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8C77FC0:01CA2BF9]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1558; t=1251915569; x=1252779569; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mcgrew@cisco.com; z=From:=20David=20McGrew=20<mcgrew@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Fwd=3A=20Request=20for=20comments=20on=20GOST=2 0documents |Sender:=20; bh=TxVMdJCkmoKYRey0vswmFp5iqCAbD+YyfTKrWGLFwEI=; b=VkA5IUbyooO0t4Vrs5I22OVBaBMVeoXbDRE0ub2vTOqeBZysamW++lZ8YN PQu6ocGiRaN192ZGT0vB2SJ0i/xoLxzsqd831nktcqLN5WCTAHJRUw+Wc4j8 Tt7UYyTE9L;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=mcgrew@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: braden@ISI.EDU, rfc-ed-board@rfc-editor.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [Cfrg] Fwd: Request for comments on GOST documents
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:20:46 -0000

Forwarding for Bob Braden (because the CFRG mail list didn't forward  
his message).

Begin forwarded message:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	[RFC-Ed-Board] Request for comments on GOST documents
> Date: 	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:35:11 -0700
> From: 	Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
> To: 	cfrg@irtf.org
> CC: 	rfc-ed-board@rfc-editor.org <rfc-ed-board@rfc-editor.org>, RFC
> Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>
>
>
> To the CFRG:
>
> The RFC Independent Submission Editor has received three documents
> dealing with the GOST cryptographic algorithms:
>
> 	draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost34102001-03.txt
> 	draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost341194-01.txt
> 	draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost2814789-01.txt
>
> We are soliciting reviews and comments on these documents.   
> Specifically
> we are looking for expert input on their completeness and clarity.
>
> Based on some of the comments on the CFRG mailing list, the RFC
> Editorial Board is considering the need for a commentary RFC to be
> published at the same time, discussing security flaws or weaknesses of
> the GOST algorithms. If you have an interest in writing such a  
> document,
> or have input for such a document, please let us know.  Jim Schaad has
> indicated a willingness to be lead author.
>
> We appreciate yoiur help in this effort!
>
> Independent Submissions Editor/bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFC-Ed-Board mailing list
> RFC-Ed-Board@rfc-editor.org
> http://rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-ed-board
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email