IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CFRG] comment on draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf: suggested non-malleability fix

Mario Cao <mario@stampery.co> Wed, 03 November 2021 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mario@stampery.co>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982643A13A4 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=stampery.co
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lv0K22yDfn_r for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ABF3A139C for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id j128-20020a1c2386000000b003301a98dd62so4439200wmj.5 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 05:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stampery.co; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=70D5iy/xRqB8rrE/376PptgGe7PglEMPcDh+d2rwcx0=; b=oC2txEmo9+QNlt9psxQ3sV+GA0RKeFftj7d4nKvzaJeK7qBuFm80VM5JdSAOgPcKQK BHAehQ+iXCJyDPZV1gsvIDjcbgGXQz3n8xu50QFZpD8qwitm+y5somvDjsh+8BHzsLQL 0ZBEqzna6lrrAgaU21MxAQU/xT8QVGGMiSgJk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=70D5iy/xRqB8rrE/376PptgGe7PglEMPcDh+d2rwcx0=; b=s65jbw+FTU1FUJcDAz+06Kxw2/YRaM1vWpLhcLmhaJc9wSBQo9+yYlmAHAE+w3ZumQ wvM2Mk1Uoont++B3JWqdYRqHCOrOgSvKYBh+RIOBhoOAOxqZTeCP/tAcXVnV8i9asBi4 anUrczofrllcur9O8iRpyZGkxeFKppMPCHlYELLgHHntCiVfk2rin2kcbNzajehuUhgb sK8Xqzn4ans0SOfXLnwoK+MqStWIGF9nZj1jkuR2cfbXFjJMHfhatexcDzw2/kq4Up8L kEDVyI97bWovPTBXZISln2eTGcq10gITlTNJ/puRneHS/wH26WSqoYgwXSdH76q3Td/x NH2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Se4WkzUxRFi+qJiTFfIsapH1qusScF5yHzSghi2kOg51b8oSe U6wJJsh9ji9SAFY/MADfKb46ql4rblKpZdmvqMqGwZA8vvjmTQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9MQavtzkY83EizSZ+WF4b/s0l2MyUMBISjGOmG82Mnk/5QGMT789XBt8eIeWdvrbKozVH+eQ48TQGvcfLBII=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c084:: with SMTP id r4mr15886966wmh.117.1635942712713; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 05:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Mario Cao <mario@stampery.co>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:31:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAHvzWTZA=Oz3H2UGm07zC4KDzB6+cJSH7zPizn_m7c=Wye1AQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: cfrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000043b6ed05cfe19815"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ZGFAkI5u10YMc_eye0ItjI99_m4>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] comment on draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf: suggested non-malleability fix
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 12:35:52 -0000

Hi,

This LC went below our radar and couldn't reply in time. We totally support
the publication of the document as an RFC.

2 different implementations of this specification are being used in
production by the Witnet protocol, and as a matter of fact no less than 400
bn VRFs have been produced and validated with these since last October:
- https://crates.io/crates/vrf
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/vrf-solidity

Thank you,
Mario Cao

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email