Re: [CFRG] [Pqc] New Liaison Statement, "Quantum Safe Cryptographic Protocol Inventory"
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> Sun, 25 February 2024 18:33 UTC
Return-Path: <djb-dsn2-1406711340.7506@cr.yp.to>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE1EC14F5FF for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:33:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnGPKjEPlUbd for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from salsa.cs.uic.edu (salsa.cs.uic.edu [131.193.32.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AB98C14F5FC for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 26445 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Feb 2024 18:33:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (unknown) by unknown with QMTP; 25 Feb 2024 18:33:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 1156816 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Feb 2024 18:33:02 -0000
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:33:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20240225183302.1156814.qmail@cr.yp.to>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: cfrg@irtf.org
Mail-Followup-To: cfrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <20240225145856.1145640.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/a5enOWoh6s4ZflTOh-Yxa6jb41E>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] [Pqc] New Liaison Statement, "Quantum Safe Cryptographic Protocol Inventory"
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:33:15 -0000
Sorry, neglected to say up top that after reflection I think that the CFRG list makes more sense for this thread than the PQC list. I think that the previous ipsec+spasm+pqc+tls+cfrg is overkill---I understand that the liaison is interested in what various IETF WGs are doing, but the proposed IETF text that I'm replying to is about security issues that are independent of the protocols. ---D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [CFRG] [Pqc] New Liaison Statement, "Quantum … D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [CFRG] New Liaison Statement, "Quantum Safe C… John Mattsson
- Re: [CFRG] [Pqc] New Liaison Statement, "Quantum … D. J. Bernstein