Re: [Cfrg] FW: WG last call on latest OCB draft.
"Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Wed, 12 June 2013 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=98754349b3=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A673321E8091 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56aA16KvpnYI for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.ll.mit.edu (MX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE3721E8053 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K7-HUB01.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K7-HUB01.mitll.ad.local) by mx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id r5CFrDgo003422; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:53:13 -0400
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:53:09 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] FW: WG last call on latest OCB draft.
Thread-Index: Ac5nhPIN4EOAlm0VRlmH/BxzxRCbIQ==
Message-ID: <CDDE112E.161E4%uri@ll.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3C4AAD4B5304AB44A6BA85173B4675CAB24340E3@MSMR-GH1-UEA03.corp.nsa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3453882789_10516725"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-06-12_06:2013-06-12, 2013-06-12, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1211240000 definitions=main-1306120110
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] FW: WG last call on latest OCB draft.
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:53:22 -0000
I see no other issue and would like to see this draft advanced. Tnx! P.S. Ted and Phil, thanks for making the tag length change! P.P.S. Ted, could you point me again at where the reference implementation is? I'd like to play with it a bit. -- Regards, Uri Blumenthal On 6/12/13 10:14 , "Igoe, Kevin M." <kmigoe@nsa.gov> wrote: >Sorry folks, I hit "Reply" vice "Reply To All". Mea culpa! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ted Krovetz [mailto:ted@krovetz.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:12 AM >> To: Igoe, Kevin M. >> Subject: Re: WG last call on latest OCB draft. >> >> Did you intend that question to go to CFRG? It looks like you >> accidentally sent it to just me. >> >> >> On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:10 AM, "Igoe, Kevin M." <kmigoe@nsa.gov> wrote: >> >> > Excellent! Does anyone have any other issues they'd like to see >> addressed? >> > I'd like to get this thru RG Last Call within a week or two. >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Ted Krovetz [mailto:ted@krovetz.net] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:08 AM >> >> To: cfrg@irtf.org >> >> Cc: Phillip Rogaway; Igoe, Kevin M. >> >> Subject: Re: WG last call on latest OCB draft. >> >> >> >> Thanks Kevin for pushing OCB along. >> >> >> >>> 2) OCB is too widespread to make such a substantive change at this >> >> late date. >> >> >> >> Actually, Phil and I have decided to make the change. We agree that >> it >> >> is a good idea, and since we figured out how to do it without >> affecting >> >> existing users of 128-bit tags, we think it's worth the break. >> >> >> >> A draft that makes the change will be posted later today or >> tomorrow. >> >> It will not need much changing over -02, so hopefully it won't take >> >> much further review. >> >> >> >> -Ted >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Cfrg mailing list >Cfrg@irtf.org >http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
- [Cfrg] FW: WG last call on latest OCB draft. Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] FW: WG last call on latest OCB draft. Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] FW: WG last call on latest OCB draft. Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] WG last call on latest OCB draft. Peter Gutmann