IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CFRG] Minor change to FROST diagram: requested confirmation

Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de> Tue, 16 April 2024 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <crypto@timruffing.de>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD07AC14F70B for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=timruffing.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bDZAjUfIdAXP for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02054C14F712 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VJk063Hygz9t1X; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:30:30 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timruffing.de; s=MBO0001; t=1713270630; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=93mgriuSbFX8JJzd7vNUJTdaFDyi/T99s8qCNx1HkKk=; b=tcjod9j+22ckTTJLEdaSkFpG+K/Th+8qqaX6w2XGG+tkeNjy9g8AwN2oIhsz7h3baJmZ9D xOCqhGpbwR0/sYQOJvSHWWUraku2lkzFR4PnKEeyo2w48azqlkkxLSxvNskTgXtn07ECFP gH+wJVNgkVkUOdHvgUv3SDGHcj/QUYou28BW4Zt9009pVhnE9GuRTPuzvb9RnG+F+xveJo kDb0G6b15ImoMLL1XdhomNB67+AlCcms6YRPQJJJHYTYCOH2+9UzKvEwrVsIUTo50QcVqS 425XiK/29wn11ursMOHB4M3pIG5BO6FNImM7mNpqMxKgRTg99sEYj6JDRkHF6Q==
Message-ID: <473047c3bf8def2bdf24eeb2b376d36b72673abc.camel@timruffing.de>
From: Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de>
To: "Conrado P. L. Gouvêa" <conradoplg@gmail.com>, Nick Sullivan <nicholas.sullivan@gmail.com>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:30:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAHTptW-mbmsorzJE=1Y0j0ZO4Pc3V2pdYeFFietZ_npTMKw0nA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOjisRxgS8bwm2Rv3XkKf1cEkutQrB3BxgHMMzo4SBF71n28dQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHTptW-mbmsorzJE=1Y0j0ZO4Pc3V2pdYeFFietZ_npTMKw0nA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/q-hVCcN40jtDWxgDWowtG-ALtxI>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Minor change to FROST diagram: requested confirmation
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:30:40 -0000

I agree, this change is correct.

Tim

On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 13:34 -0300, Conrado P. L. Gouvêa wrote:
> This looks correct. The message is indeed not required in Round 1,
> and this fact is not currently being reflected in the figure (but
> it's correct elsewhere in the draft). This change would fix that.
> 
> Conrado
> 
> 
> Em qua., 3 de abr. de 2024 às 15:16, Nick Sullivan
> <nicholas.sullivan@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > Hello CFRG,
> > 
> > The RFC editors are in the final stages of publishing the FROST
> > draft. The authors caught a discrepancy that may be confusing to
> > readers and proposed the following change in response:
> > https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-frost/pull/470
> > 
> > Can someone on the list who has read or implemented the draft
> > confirm this change matches their expectations? We want to get
> > prompt feedback so we can finish the publication.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Nick (for chairs)
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org
> https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email