IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CFRG] Re: [EXT] Re: NIST PQC: HQC Announced as a 4th Round Selection

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Thu, 13 March 2025 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: cfrg@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE97AF7F7C for <cfrg@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KHxaSdg97sy for <cfrg@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C84AF7F73 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2239c066347so29734455ad.2 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741894080; x=1742498880; darn=irtf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rUtVZl1JFwRcsNpKWUWtnhG+RsOU5h109dYM9vTU4FM=; b=aaPbWC2jnlG0SEfhfGe3dOZTLf0HRcM/vhYi70DJcAE4D8yE4l49gmtVloUKed++s5 gyadbvMwVETMLOt5CFplyGv+nAciDCRW4BhqydGoSElwSe4rEnVYGYSE6JD1ZmKQLa4e KLeYAlMVtAWUq2sSANNA8X2jDnaBXf7bCL9YdmvvJHBcGRFNxO0M1qQ4D8g/6xA6IEEC mUAE4INreKLI1cD/Q1PUcyUFHlo060aWyfJzWQ5FEi9p79Ei50rVB4FD5R0KfnsSHydY A2pCySOwjtSiM+9JjM+/Zf3XZpWgTCeKML1k8kY7QZ/6VzYOUi03k++ksC0nx9lpxNYW 0DHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741894080; x=1742498880; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rUtVZl1JFwRcsNpKWUWtnhG+RsOU5h109dYM9vTU4FM=; b=HNRAOtnAmu99I5zhjlKMygRHXhjP6RkJLOmggol3UzHYRPJ6gHDURfBL8aNp4eTaA7 dMKb5DYwETz7SBunQOf5pk0QtEwcj7PwbWQCI7/iAF8qktAqwG9MEESFTYKrQ9cXtJaR DQcDRj7sAHYp+Ma1a56LoCX13GpTVHDmcxjP1D4vJPUboXmMJIUhcSY8Nbkr3PTHwwK5 k1afOsu00BnmAoNbUgd0TAIWAzcsU6s5a3vLUnndg2NXccQXRISfRt2UCy2aXKGwXX/1 YWARxDCKCMjT4Dfdfk8dDJTDYrHM5o/kpDX7YMmFWsn20F2co812/5VPTLcNC2p0a1rZ gD7A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUxHLqRe1ZXVOph6UcophydKQvFsVC8ae0J45givDgSncwN2MoJp+A9ncin7TnWCG6MulfF@irtf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywo2W5YT6F+0Exu8K53WU0ECQsbpgdBPEXKQh/Clso7ppLaNWlw EOp6zA32yvQstg9IMGRvGRj6k8sTbv6qPYOFEmGFP2CoSJHQi3sGw8k9B0MBKXi6ZIIAzUq5Y5S fw8dAq/Z+EHCAbBA6kGWd+UhGzJA=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctVnIkEsIEholT+XnOtnHclfysg5dnRcRmkJfD6DHrlRJf2aAg7KGVlQUwohlB h7dJbgZvt6QFaHRXfXlMcu80yW+cm6tE9pDDyG08xjlUfdrXkKq8Si7yUeDF79aJOCDkNmpvVpT aIryAvEBra0DfNWOORUfqP3bAZhzT5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHOhfDpuC2uV3RXLUyJHxxkcy/9ztZ1ZzqDy1CRD+3MCKh0HeLbzw3ZVN8wtEbpWgUe2yPj7JizeRQjxyFAcJA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3d47:b0:2ee:a583:e616 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3014e842f76mr898351a91.9.1741894080566; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFR824wdR90+0TSX_Ah-Bctt5YoYNvCqjvR+W7ba=+6mVQWNgw@mail.gmail.com> <5B4424E6-56D1-4F58-ACBE-913B0C1002F9@gmail.com> <CAFR824zep-CR_gHonS7QNn7rasjdbFvUtW+AggdB-UsBH_J33Q@mail.gmail.com> <GVXPR07MB9678443FA0B19D803C2783D789D02@GVXPR07MB9678.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAAC2647-CFB8-4488-BCCB-8363EF94301F@gmail.com> <GVXPR07MB9678E9121120EBB4C24CCBD689D32@GVXPR07MB9678.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOp4FwROR8C6F+7h9gFttUnXKOMaJtOSKoPA4ZWSxCTqOYKc=w@mail.gmail.com> <PH1P110MB1412851CAA39C668610F7C4F90D3A@PH1P110MB1412.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <PH1P110MB1412851CAA39C668610F7C4F90D3A@PH1P110MB1412.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:27:46 +0400
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JpOyOkDx9c76wUV8l25D6-S9I3yED6jJKIFKFKho_7-GGDo-ZClSheseXY
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwTM79mQ5whRqryKqhyiuuvfRNP9uW799wH9eFLre3xMrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: 2VM2WAFTRZXCOYS5CXEHBP54WBSRJBME
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2VM2WAFTRZXCOYS5CXEHBP54WBSRJBME
X-MailFrom: loganaden@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: [EXT] Re: NIST PQC: HQC Announced as a 4th Round Selection
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/xi03mIcsM8myjcSMqCiY0A_WEao>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 23:20, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
<uri@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > Neil Madden wrote:
> > >+1 to this. It would be good to see a CFRG RFC for Classic McEliece (or a hybrid using it).
>
> It would help with the user-base which is already using Classic McEliece, if
> this happens within the IETF.
>
>
>
> If people are already using Classic McEliece – what do they need IETF “blessing” for? To look “more legitimate”?
For better interop among  implementations ?

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status