Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11
Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Sun, 11 February 2018 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C404127735 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:50:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mgj2HLLozcx for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com (mail-ua0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DFFE12762F for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id q8so8373292uae.4 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:50:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vdcoVBKQGFr7yPmEEF+aNHiSuS/z15LdxfDQFfC/vzQ=; b=SQD6gTTuLx1FoI8ooMaTRNoTVuc2nc8NR7/F9RrHuP3Ye7/32PrHfFsk/d5Ro/TL8S xvvz6YmhFgvbl5yZ8TlRozr5cQU/8A8W5rMJMLBJPVvQI9IuAEu8RFt4O/h4dM47kLEL a9T3NljqKQGqxoY5e8ctVFK5BDp/6dyIp+eU3A/Y2klbuY0eUKEeya1ouhjOWInPmL5d TgPOUvrh8IwOVxjTG+Ru0byRpnuDrNH7K4jgEuHkiJABqZqrUGcQuyQa3A0TPh8Xmy+y wnQnO3W6C73Ir30pGS6uhMOW+FkRd62V7EXfKxcSEMt9/ukjMEhtgCzWElHR0igCwHB8 M4ug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vdcoVBKQGFr7yPmEEF+aNHiSuS/z15LdxfDQFfC/vzQ=; b=QN7l2oCvqtsGDlAXgRmBcDO/DiqNCq4VPaTGRoFOL9fiauMIX5aCOckFybs2FJR0tM Dswdb3twX5/6keEBhOvSzOOWiWnvMUObWgmsGCwVf+1YwChdh6bctvCvj0oYVS0pXzqH biskP+Lfy/bsYI1crPGtLjxW/VueSvDnmwAXOOFu6HEa9AZomFHk/G3xT7zsGe2fqEfP lEWTD6qgx6cPZa7v+S90bfe2P289ApeX/i5KvXFB54VH5jmIkqfYiI5G1R8BDtnXWNFK J1V1i0mJxZEPyN4TbhQJfDdooblI+xCI/eHYf2HeyXVGXlGoxo34XSp/7KE62HQeUic4 bK7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDJDHYX/2dukH/CVuf5gs7byvWjq/imUnJA8tuQ7bOO82oNLpio uA6vzzVrDrIBlTid81AsAs9maaUcM86F3fYbqxI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2268zyrl3sih1L0wEYr7WfXVFKAHtMRN2Biu9Kkaaen4H0rYlkr/o2uamXJ2IqL5HFw+bYZfqtQBuYxX7BEhMhM=
X-Received: by 10.176.85.195 with SMTP id w3mr7889565uaa.145.1518385811378; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:50:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.22.7 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:49:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5A7F290B.1080902@isode.com>
References: <5A7F290B.1080902@isode.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:49:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVK0xzTUVHExJ5dWhX6vSgShd7AkohAXcBqysNYmD2NDMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e2590eb57da0564f6be91"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ycj0kmQ7Js2rmJKS-bFQ9IlhwUA>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:50:14 -0000
I have not thoroughly reviewed all of this document: I have only been particularly interested in section 5.2: parallelizable KDFs (and in particular 5.2.1 describing a parallelizable cipher-based KDF). I can at least say that I second what Ira said: it addresses an important topic, and in absence of a comprehensive document like this I have seen people refer to earlier, expired drafts (e.g. draft-agl-ckdf) looking for solutions for these same needs as my own. Therefore I support its publication. -- Tony Arcieri
- [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11 Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11 Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11 Ira McDonald
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11 Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-11 Tim Hollebeek