Re: [CGA-EXT] cancelling the CSI meeting at ietf 75

[marcelo bagnulo braun <[e-mail]>]

Sean Shen escribió:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: marcelo bagnulo braun [mailto:[e-mail]] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 4:53 PM
>> To: Sean Shen
>> Cc: [e-mail]; gabriel montenegro
>> Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] cancelling the CSI meeting at ietf 75
>>
>> Sean Shen escribió:
>>     
>>>  hi, Chairs,
>>> That's a big surprise, I was waiting for the chair's call for 
>>> presentation in IETF75.
>>>   
>>>       
>> As you can see in the ml archive
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext/current/maillist.html
>>
>> since the end of last meeting 27 of march, there have been 13 
>> posts of which 2 of them are about cancelling the meeting, 2 
>> were ID announces, one announce and the minutes being posted, 
>> which leave us 7 posts of discussion, wich i think it is a 
>> clear sign that people should do more work on the ml before 
>> having a face to face meeting
>>     
> [Sean] 2 of posts about cancelling meeting are the current thread, I was
> waiting for the query that whether people hope to meet and what will be
> proposed. 
> So, does that means csi wg will not hold meeting and plan to handle proposed
> topics only on ml during ietf75?
>   
well, it means that the WG work is done mainly through the ml and if 
there is no ml activity it means we haven't worked, so there is no point 
in using f2f time

>   
>>> At least I am planning to present the new implementation of 
>>>       
>> SeND&CGA 
>>     
>>> (joint work of BUPT and Huawei) and issues we found during the 
>>> implementation. Also we have submitted 
>>> draft-cheneau-send-sig-agility-01 and
>>> draft-cheneau-cga-pk-agility-01 which address the comments from 
>>> ietf74, Tony is planning to present the drafts in Stockholm. We 
>>> believes that these two drafts are ready for a last call
>>>       
>> i am kind of surprised... i mean the documents are not even 
>> wg documents and you thinks they are ready for wglc?
>> How many reviews from the WG did this document got?
>>     
> [Sean] Calling for adoption as wg document is exactly what I mean here.
well, is not what you said, as you can read above in your own message, 
where it read "ready for a last call"


Regards, marcelo

>  We
> did not assume that being adopted as WG document is the final stage, WG
> documents are still open for further improvement when people are unhappy
> about them. We gathered a lot of valuable comments from ietf74 and improved
> drafts based on those comments.
>
> regards,
>
> Sean
>
>  
>
>
>