[CGA-EXT] Should we adopt draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02 as WG document?
Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com> Thu, 25 June 2009 01:04 UTC
Return-Path: <shengjiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD7E28C4D9 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dil9hQG9ywpj for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6485328C4EE for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KLR002GTSADXX@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for cga-ext@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:03:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.33]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KLR001LCSADWN@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for cga-ext@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:03:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from j66104a ([10.111.12.60]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KLR00LV4SACMX@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for cga-ext@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:03:49 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:03:48 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
In-reply-to:
To: Marcelo Bagnulo Braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, cga-ext@ietf.org
Message-id: <001001c9f530$cc24d110$3c0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: Acn1LryfbWLHspEaTpuWwIy5T+wSbQAAdS1w
Cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: [CGA-EXT] Should we adopt draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02 as WG document?
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:04:15 -0000
Resend, the previous one has no mail title. Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:49 AM > To: Marcelo Bagnulo Braun; 'cga-ext@ietf.org' > Cc: Ralph Droms; Jari Arkko; Tim Chown; Shuo Shen > Subject: > > Dear CSI chairs and DHC chairs, > > A new version of draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps has been > submitted to IETF CSI WG. Comments from Marcelo and CSI > maillist have been integrated. IPv6 and DHCP expert, Tim > Chown has joined us for both technical and editoral works. As > far as I consider, all the technical points have been > discussed and agreed in the CSI WG and we don't need to > repeat technical details in IETF 75 through we may talk about > more works this ps suggests to CSI WG. I believe this update > version is ready to be adopted as WG document. Can we launch > the WG adoption last call now? > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02 > > Best regards, > > Sheng