[cicm] CICM BOF Approved for IETF 81
"Novikov, Lev" <lnovikov@mitre.org> Fri, 17 June 2011 19:34 UTC
Return-Path: <lnovikov@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: cicm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cicm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1F99E8031 for <cicm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrK-Qsq7ucnx for <cicm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (smtpksrv1.mitre.org [198.49.146.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373339E800A for <cicm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E80C21B1707 for <cicm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imchub1.MITRE.ORG (imchub1.mitre.org [129.83.29.73]) by smtpksrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E3E21B16E5 for <cicm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.206]) by imchub1.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.73]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:34:52 -0400
From: "Novikov, Lev" <lnovikov@mitre.org>
To: "CICM Discussion List (cicm@ietf.org)" <cicm@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:33:25 -0400
Thread-Topic: CICM BOF Approved for IETF 81
Thread-Index: AcwtJWzOCK69+yoiSCyVUv2RQUoPJw==
Message-ID: <F9AB58FA72BAE7449E7723791F6993ED062C94CAC2@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [cicm] CICM BOF Approved for IETF 81
X-BeenThere: cicm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: CICM Discussion List <cicm@ietf.org>
List-Id: CICM Discussion List <cicm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cicm>, <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cicm>
List-Post: <mailto:cicm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cicm>, <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:34:54 -0000
On 2011-05-13 13:01, Lev Novikov wrote: > I'm formally requesting a BoF at IETF 81 to form a CICM WG [...] Well I'm pleased to announce that the BOF has been approved. See: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart#Security What this means: 1. We (as a community) have one hour to make the case that CICM is a worthwhile endeavor and that neither PKCS#11 nor GSS-API can be simply extended to accommodate the needs that CICM addresses. 2. We need people to participate in the Jabber chat session (or in person in Quebec City, Canada) to voice their position on this effort. It will take place sometime during the week of July 24-29; the exact day/time will be announced later. ** Please respond to this email letting me know if you plan on attending the BOF in person or online via the Jabber session. Thanks, Lev
- [cicm] CICM BOF Approved for IETF 81 Novikov, Lev