Re: Last Call: Implications of Various Address Allocation Policies for Internet Routing to BCP

[Paul Ferguson <[e-mail]>]

At 10:20 AM 2/12/96 -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote:

>
>    It is silent as to what end-users are supposed to do!
>
>Sure, but not every IETF document includes the whole technical picture of the
>entire 'Net, especially not in complex problems like this one. A group (the
>PIER group) has been started to crank out documents, etc, to show "what
>end-users are supposed to do". This document just explains the routing part of
>the problem.
>

Noel did a good job of expressing the problem(s) facing the Internet as
a whole.

With regards to PIER, our solicitation has been advanced to Informational
and should appear shortly.

FYI.

- paul

[snip]

To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <[e-mail]>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
From: The IESG <[e-mail]>
Subject: Document Action: Enterprise Renumbering: Experience and
	 Information Solicitation to Informational
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:10:15 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: [e-mail]



  The IESG has reviewed the Internet-Draft "Enterprise Renumbering:
  Experience and Information Solicitation"
  <draft-ietf-pier-solicitation-00.txt> and recommends that it be
  published by the RFC Editor as an Informational RFC. This document is
  the product of the Procedures for Internet/Enterprise Renumbering
  Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Scott Bradner and Michael
  O'Dell.

[snip]