IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: CIDRization

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Thu, 22 August 1996 17:44 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa08640; 22 Aug 96 13:44 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa08636; 22 Aug 96 13:44 EDT
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10984; 22 Aug 96 13:44 EDT
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (brookfield-ef0.brookfield.ans.net [204.148.1.20]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id CAA22362 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 02:33:56 +1000
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (localhost.brookfield.ans.net [127.0.0.1]) by brookfield.ans.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA29884; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 12:32:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199608221632.MAA29884@brookfield.ans.net>
To: Hank Nussbacher <HANK@taunivm.tau.ac.il>
cc: roll@stupi.se, cidrd@iepg.org
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: CIDRization
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:03:26 +0700." <199608221102.VAA18675@nico.aarnet.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 12:32:54 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>

In message <199608221102.VAA18675@nico.aarnet.edu.au>, Hank Nussbacher writes:
> The following nets appear to be easily aggregated:
> 
> *>i192.108.200.0/29 194.68.128.34               210      0 1880 i
> *>i192.108.200.0/21 194.68.128.34               210      0 1880 i
> *>i192.108.201.0    194.68.128.34               210      0 1880 i
> 
> Since you are announcing 192.108.200.0/21 you should have no
> problem withdrawing the other 2 announcements (especially
> the /29).
> 
> Hank


Hank,

There are well over 3,000 prefixes that are /24 or shorter and covered
by aggregates that are both registered in the IRR and announced.

I didn't bother trying to count prefixes longer than /24.  I didn't
think there were many and most providers block them anyway.

Curtis

ps-  I hope your not going to send mail for each block in this set of
3,000+ prefixes.  :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email