Re: classless inaddr
Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net> Fri, 06 December 1996 01:07 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa02255; 5 Dec 96 20:07 EST
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00922; 5 Dec 96 20:07 EST
Received: from [203.50.0.66] (gorp.telstra.net [203.50.0.66]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id LAA20969; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 11:09:26 +1100
X-Sender: gih@nico.aarnet.edu.au
Message-Id: <v02140b09aecd1b1458b6@[203.50.0.66]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 11:09:44 +1000
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
From: Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>
Subject: Re: classless inaddr
Cc: cidrd@iepg.org
At 5:51 PM 5/12/96, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >Will any progress be made on this doc? I see no discussion here >on the matter. > >Hank Nussbacher I was under the impression that the draft was suitable for publication as a BCP as was. But its now a DNSIND call I suppose. Geoff
- classless inaddr Hank Nussbacher
- Re: classless inaddr Randy Bush
- Re: classless inaddr Randy Bush
- Re: classless inaddr Robert Elz
- Re: classless inaddr Geoff Huston
- Re: classless inaddr Randy Bush