Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF today

Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com> Wed, 28 July 2010 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gene@alertlogic.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F46C3A681E; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWpg87Z5qRgt; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp171.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp171.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A683A680B; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay17.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay17.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 447622C73342; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:05:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp192.mex07a.mlsrvr.com (smtp192.mex07a.mlsrvr.com [67.192.133.192]) by relay17.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id D05A42C731EF; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:05:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com ([192.168.1.62]) by 222721-HUB08.mex07a.mlsrvr.com ([192.168.1.207]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:05:19 -0500
From: Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com>
To: "Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com>, "clouds-bounces@ietf.org" <clouds-bounces@ietf.org>, "carlw@mcsr-labs.org" <carlw@mcsr-labs.org>, "sjj@google.com" <sjj@google.com>, Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:04:20 -0500
Thread-Topic: [clouds] Clouds BoF today
Thread-Index: Acsudw58cOaq3bsDQryGD3NB5l6gYQ==
Message-ID: <25539801.360383.1280336717863.JavaMail.rim@bda418.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
References: <002401cb2e73$59534fe0$0bf9efa0$@org><317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA8950027876FE@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA8950027876FE@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 1291465288
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_255398013603831280336717863JavaMailrimbda418bisxprodonb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "clouds@ietf.org" <clouds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF today
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com>
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:05:07 -0000

+1 and actually many more


Gene - Sent via BlackBerry

________________________________
From: "Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com>
Sender: "clouds-bounces@ietf.org" <clouds-bounces@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:53:13 -0500
To: carlw@mcsr-labs.org<carlw@mcsr-labs.org>; sjj@google.com<sjj@google.com>; Bhumip Khasnabish<vumip1@gmail.com>
Cc: clouds@ietf.org<clouds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF today


+1!


-----Original Message-----
From: clouds-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Carl Williams
Sent: Wed 7/28/2010 9:38 AM
To: sjj@google.com; 'Bhumip Khasnabish'
Cc: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: [clouds] Clouds BoF today



Thanks Sam for your excellent opening presentation from Google.  It showed
specific areas that are required by IETF to undertake these efforts and why
without IETF involved there would be a great deal of problems.     I also
thought that the SDO survey and gap analysis presented is useful.



I am glad to see the 100+ participants at the Bar BoF and the feedback was
rather positive that we do this work.  The other observation was that the
operators and other providers such as Google are leading the effort!



Please continue on despite a couple of push-backs .  It is important work.
I know it will be a challenge but it appears that you have service providers
that are helping you and behind you.



Carl