Re: [clue] clue - Not having a session at IETF 103

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 September 2018 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01153129619; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6xFZXYodL2T; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD2E12008A; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local ([205.197.219.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w83FbfNq039487 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:37:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [205.197.219.90] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <session-request@ietf.org>
Cc: ron.even.tlv@gmail.com, clue-chairs@ietf.org, clue@ietf.org
References: <153440131941.3180.14760258451559721844.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <3eeb63b7-69d9-a8eb-831a-9ce50c0fd39f@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 10:37:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <153440131941.3180.14760258451559721844.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/HcSkdOLxv1fleCBWrpbiqFVTUZ4>
Subject: Re: [clue] clue - Not having a session at IETF 103
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 15:37:46 -0000

CLUE chairs --

Do you want to reconsider this in light of the remaining open item on 
clue-protocol needing to be closed? If the WG can't close on-list, I 
think I'd like to see a real-time discussion of the open issue so that 
we can get the WG's documents published.

/a

On 8/16/18 01:35, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool wrote:
>
> Roni Even, a chair of the clue working group, indicated that the clue working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 103.
>
> This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.
>
>