[clue] New tickets related to signaling & transport solution
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 27 August 2012 22:21 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A887821E8034 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NT0EnLPQknTn for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D468311E808A for <clue@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahm15 with SMTP id m15so3035893lah.31 for <clue@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SO6bfban6r/7/IioUw9sRcgybl8in92xOivBDUxYo70=; b=YbyDMBhSkeIODm117E8Hb0V/5DjG5Gl2WT/QoYwrT0eJ9eaTMtBnpfLUMKJGkF1/8j fk8ZiH+Fkvbw9h4CFpeXji9gZWPUoqb/b/p6SXr9RJagRhxzvoQZjbzwHucsxpLiRt5Q axkVYVxPPlmvxI6bM+4ajnU2OzG3QKjrOqOI0WnQiVtY6UNXli8FhHRc807dVJ7CUt4q 5NCCF2FzuMs1+RQmrnOZdtFB+0/LQ6g02YyLKQ0+9tmEUZ/CgxQeo72w+1DvoDfmZTKX IwaFGUPdifSp9jFKfMx2pG8gS+uYfOLAZN4dWfd/KUqU1kP3sMzxkB+HlgbDyfnoYjJu Bj8A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.46.135 with SMTP id v7mr7363118lbm.3.1346106114686; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.17.202 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:21:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN6XTwE737JL+QdGwjQ_MYYGgmnZ6-X18rY_ppEk-SOsQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: CLUE <clue@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec55240becbbf6104c846c01c"
Subject: [clue] New tickets related to signaling & transport solution
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clue>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:21:56 -0000
Hi all, I created 4 new tickets based upon the "issues going forward" as summarized in the IETF-84 minutes: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-clue.txt Note, that #12 and #13 can't be resolved until we have a data model on the table. However, we could start considering #14 & #15 (note that I've separated the decision about the signaling protocol from the transport protocol). This draft summarized various options for the "signaling protocol" (and not the transport protocol): http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wenger-clue-transport-02.txt We didn't really make any progress on the topic really other than agreeing that SDP is not sufficient for signaling CLUE information: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-clue.txt And, the call flow document we discussed at IETF-84 also gets into the signaling solution: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-romanow-clue-call-flow-02.txt We are kind of in a chicken/egg situation right now since we don't have a "message schema" or "clue instance" data model developed. But, it might still be worthwhile to review the two above documents and at least eliminate some more of the options or agree some things. Regards, Mary.