Re: DRAFT Minutes of March 23 telechat

Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Fri, 24 March 1995 17:37 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03376; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03371; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04925; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03359; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03355; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04920; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03349; 24 Mar 95 12:37 EST
To: pvm@isi.edu
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: DRAFT Minutes of March 23 telechat
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Mar 95 06:15:08 PST." <199503241415.AA22714@zephyr.isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 12:37:15 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9503241237.aa03349@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

>> The IESG felt that the normal course of actions would be to create an
>> SSL I-D and refer the SSL developers to the IETF WG.  However, if the
>> SSL folks felt that the WG's aims were incompatible, we should allow
>> informational publication with a disclaimer by Schiller and Klensin.

I'll revise the minutes to incorporate this text.


Steve