Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT proposition at IETF 91

Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov> Thu, 21 August 2014 18:11 UTC

Message-ID: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D046CC683D@fcc.gov>
From: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
To: 'Richard Shockey' <richard@shockey.us>, 'Paul Kyzivat' <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "cnit@ietf.org" <cnit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT proposition at IETF 91
Thread-Index: AQHPvVBNHipw2TiR40+2lSDiYcBuhpvbJjwQgABLxwD//78PcIAAZJMA///F/DA=
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:11:53 +0000
References: <00db01cfbb05$be76c8c0$3b645a40$@shockey.us> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D046CB9C2F@fcc.gov> <728F35AE98AEDB4A96FF3A32A85A60BB394D808F@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <010601cfbcaa$55be97d0$013bc770$@shockey.us> <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3BBFBEA02@sc9-ex2k10mb1.corp.yaanatech.com> <01d801cfbcdc$a9c59900$fd50cb00$@shockey.us> <53F60877.8050107@alum.mit.edu> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D046CC5478@fcc.gov> <53F61082.1010708@alum.mit.edu> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D046CC5AFD@fcc.gov> <010a01cfbd66$9f017360$dd045a20$@shockey.us>
In-Reply-To: <010a01cfbd66$9f017360$dd045a20$@shockey.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cnit/s2eRbdj3ST7mdwZBuOIz-p_FX3Y
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT proposition at IETF 91
Precedence: list

Since you asked about ARID, here's the link to the long-expired I-D:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ono-dispatch-attribute-validation-00

It doesn't quite solve the same problem, particularly since it predates the STIR discussion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Shockey [mailto:richard@shockey.us] 
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 1:38 PM
To: Henning Schulzrinne; 'Paul Kyzivat'; cnit@ietf.org
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT proposition at IETF 91

Essentially yes.  Paul this is my point as well.  The solution space is not that large.

 Its easy to postulate the rough outline of a solution here. The general tools exist in some form already. In short this is not rocket science.

 If you dive too far into policy here it will become rocket science since it will be impossible to cover every corner case we can devise and there are a lot of them.  Which is why IMHO a charter here needs to be very very carefully crafted to limit scope. That is the problem DISPATCH and the AD's will have to confront at some point in time.

[cnit] Restarting the CNAM CNIT proposition at IE… Richard Shockey
Re: [cnit] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT propos… Henning Schulzrinne
Re: [cnit] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT propos… Hala Mowafy
Re: [cnit] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT propos… Henning Schulzrinne
Re: [cnit] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT propos… Richard Shockey
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Michael Hammer
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Richard Shockey
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Michael Hammer
Re: [cnit] [stir] Restarting the CNAM CNIT propos… Hala Mowafy
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Paul Kyzivat
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Henning Schulzrinne
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Paul Kyzivat
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Henning Schulzrinne
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Richard Shockey
Re: [cnit] [dispatch] [stir] Restarting the CNAM … Henning Schulzrinne
Re: [cnit] [stir] [dispatch] Restarting the CNAM … Tony Rutkowski
Re: [cnit] [stir] [dispatch] Restarting the CNAM … Richard Shockey
Re: [cnit] [stir] [dispatch] Restarting the CNAM … Brian Rosen