[codec] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-03.txt

Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca> Thu, 01 September 2016 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7101F12D747 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jmvalin-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94XgPyVG0pxd for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1D512D737 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38so8618869qte.1 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jmvalin-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w7EBRsfL0XDVlRv97T70p3OKlVohMU/dyjpvKONjOjY=; b=ldwFEIzAtlURAaWlMb/CQ0jC3lH5f3g7u8ex9Oo7K7Dc6c2hwrAw1XMMGCi1HTY1+B Qkaz7K3UZRo+HhMR6zeq4xTuyGEE0GqUXZ3hp0Jm+8hHfsCRaWcrxW1hxpY6Z57mYRxu w0hoEmqG1kk9L3Oqu0lALsRS+6bQpGwCYvwSe2zUi8j5K5W62qQJd7C0lxzMm+qnYgA+ EaTxAmkA0ND8VUUwwAUxU6f9fFM6nipGFZUEdjQTQK9/CO26YMMNgewVV+8/y5tTWykK uC0n2R0kKxG0vkvbM2G27O3xBOvbQX28GtCz5H0HF3e2I/SR8Df0Rie+sxiBX7e++fwp kxBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w7EBRsfL0XDVlRv97T70p3OKlVohMU/dyjpvKONjOjY=; b=VazN9q4FcYb/1cc+zKGE4Ggx2u9FMmWmSzbDiakHvR10x+KPoeA7kA8MOEA4bkkDNe H9DICp4Q3c1tHh1CRASYTuXENF3RYNrcHiLqazdVH+6ML7GurQVbamO/cgTdYevz9Icr 9iSucJ4mLkFXGxpQKnXvVPgXMdF5eqzaSNm+R4MiHPEr8oJoM/ETl3GgW9t8CtZexgwQ RRwa8FCvTD2WZ1quy6A/Y38WVC1fBOmKprbbniNnlUEZiYO8aDEmJxuIdbPX8chL54xO 9w74Xy+hjCHnPDQ+tFQ6I9tciVI7DM9dGhkwlWMSlwZ85wMwVh39U3eiWnxqhL2yq+82 CYTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMUQeeJdHtw8qw8z7V+VIIq6hDn5FFLGiv4UCEjnF5Ab/EXYHDzTKh4O9CcQI0jSA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id p32mr13695041qtc.0.1472760821208; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panoramix.jmvalin.ca ([]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 73sm3835145qkt.12.2016. for <codec@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: <147275540488.32075.5908406792224056353.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <147275540488.32075.5908406792224056353.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <fe060bab-0e31-ccfb-ce7e-a683beb6d445@jmvalin.ca>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:13:40 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <147275540488.32075.5908406792224056353.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/3F-VOLlC2EEmi4EyMmmYL9lbL5U>
Subject: [codec] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-03.txt
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 20:13:44 -0000


I just uploaded a new version of the Opus draft. It adds fixes for two
decoder integer wrap-around issues discovered through fuzzing. None of
them is particularly frightening, but they still needed to be fixed. At
this point, I do not expect more fixes to this document -- please let me
know if you think I missed something.

I'm also realizing just how much the "current" codebase on
opus-codec.org has come to differ from the code in RFC6716. This
includes many many fixes and improvements to the encoder and fixed-point
decoder. Since they are not normative bitstream changes, they are not
included in this update draft. I think it would be nice to update the
IETF "reference implementation" of Opus to reflect the improvements.
That being said, I'm not sure what's the best way to do that. I can
think of several options:

1) An (informational?) RFC with updated based64 tarball containing the
newest version
2) A tarball of the new version uploaded as meeting material like the
original testvectors (where would we link to it?)
3) Somehow mirroring the opus-coder.org downloads on the IETF website

There's probably other options too. Any thoughts?



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [codec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-03.txt
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 11:43:24 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: codec@ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
This draft is a work item of the Internet Wideband Audio Codec of the IETF.

        Title           : Updates to the Opus Audio Codec
        Authors         : Jean-Marc Valin
                          Koen Vos
	Filename        : draft-ietf-codec-opus-update-03.txt
	Pages           : 9
	Date            : 2016-09-01

   This document addresses minor issues that were found in the
   specification of the Opus audio codec in RFC 6716 [RFC6716].

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There's also a htmlized version available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

codec mailing list