IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] Updated Agenda for Codec BOF

"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Thu, 09 July 2009 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEBD3A6927 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KZSGsks-yWwA for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (mx05.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC33A67DD for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoeneLenovoT60 (dslb-088-067-100-033.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.67.100.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n696I2l2011451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:18:09 +0200
From: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: 'Jason Fischl' <jason.fischl@skype.net>, codec@ietf.org
References: <C67A52FF.E06E%jason.fischl@skype.net>
In-Reply-To: <C67A52FF.E06E%jason.fischl@skype.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:18:00 +0200
Message-ID: <000601ca005d$078f70c0$16ae5240$@de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcoADL6NDQYWlWNhYUCCNQajsOKOZgAT7O5g
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus-Spam-Check: clean (checked by Avira MailGate: version: 3.0.0-4; spam filter version: 3.0.0/2.0; host: mx05)
X-AntiVirus: checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.0.0-4; AVE: 8.2.0.204; VDF: 7.1.4.205; host: mx05); id=29984-vuSOX1
Subject: Re: [codec] Updated Agenda for Codec BOF
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:17:55 -0000

> 4. What type of engineering work would this be? ( 25 min )
> Have presentations on the two proposed codecs. Focus is to make sure it
> looks feasible to do the technical
> work to meet the goals. This should also help clarify what type of work is
> being considered.
> - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vos-silk-00.txt
> - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-valin-celt-codec-00.txt

I just like to remind the chairs that their is a third proposed codec which
will fulfill the assumed goals of this WG. SBC has a much lower complexity
than CELT and achieves nearly the some quality vs. rate performance
tradeoff. And it has been standardized already.

Christian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email