[Codematch-develop] Tomorrow's meeting and updates

"Wanderson Paim" <wanderson.jesus@rnp.br> Tue, 20 October 2015 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <wanderson.jesus@rnp.br>
X-Original-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D651ACE15 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.04
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.04 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7n2RX2Ju2DIb for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.rnp.br (mail-mx-out-02.rnp.br []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18D01A92E1 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mtaout-proxy-02.rnp.br (mail-mtaout-proxy-02.rnp.br []) by mx1.rnp.br (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id t9KIk8xo019181 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:46:08 -0200
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mail-mtaout-proxy-02.rnp.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296CE3388B for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:46:01 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from mail-mtaout-proxy-02.rnp.br ([]) by localhost (mail-mtaout-proxy-02.rnp.br []) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id XpK12zJaAJnd for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:46:01 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from CTICBSBPC02 (host56.na-df.rnp.br []) by mail-mtaout-proxy-02.rnp.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1718E336D4 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:46:01 -0200 (BRST)
From: "Wanderson Paim" <wanderson.jesus@rnp.br>
To: "codematch-develop" <codematch-develop@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:46:07 -0200
Message-ID: <010401d10b67$95047790$bf0d66b0$@rnp.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0105_01D10B56.D17BA790"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdELZ0bP6BAB/Yl/S86+0XxfcTRbjQ==
Content-Language: pt-br
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=; country=BR; latitude=-23.5477; longitude=-46.6358; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=-23.5477,-46.6358&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: base:zimbra (inherits from base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codematch-develop/WF6upn7j-9KX_7fO98OZXBvgidc>
Subject: [Codematch-develop] Tomorrow's meeting and updates
X-BeenThere: codematch-develop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Discussion forum for the planning, coordination, and development of CodeMatch\"" <codematch-develop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codematch-develop/>
List-Post: <mailto:codematch-develop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:46:13 -0000

Hello everyone,


I'm warning you beforehand that Lisandro and I will not be able to attend
our weekly meeting of tomorrow. We will be in a workshop all day long.


I had a meeting with Matheus today and he told me that all bugs we found in
the demonstration of last week were fixed. Furthermore, he is working on the
screens to show the right fields of a CodeMatch, when it refers to a
previously developed project. We pretend to deploy the next version at
27/Nov, one day before our next meeting. After that, Christian can insert
more representative examples. 


Just to confirm. The demonstrations in Yokohama will be done by accessing
our deployment in Brazil, right? Or should we deploy it somewhere else?


Best regards,