[Codematch-develop] Review of mockups

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 June 2015 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F92A1A8915 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 07:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gvxm0bMiouH9 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 07:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88EA1A8913 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 07:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so16299630wig.0 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fkACfHxz9RKIz7v/Pi6fz4sqaYGGVKJbdOQk7ZRW6Sw=; b=CAR7HzoAN0XHe56VUOlPf6e6pTiMY8u2FjQ94Qs/gTkSdtFeQIo7pkGxSybhnBe3aj hTSwbaOcTCEw/Fr4LJTCSFyI6IYDBse+YCFje/4ZN2/dXs2SbvrqWV6KsX4WPPNpr1d8 iizcu5fN/Wg4VxPG8GjElfPrmyBBgvGHVO0CNHYExF8hECZ5l6MtEk+uf9W4rH+WWeYN 1X0efQvBie+xWYaDmAsQcW1+jH/uTu2i+9UM908T2rBLX+1zbj+mt63zCxpNpNAiYbxT wC7ZBkBfOcga4iygqeC9I7RWO1mEvGgb1A0wRzKJ1QvjbzkjkCl3+fRibS+nT96Rd3wi XMoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.9.104 with SMTP id y8mr43878148wja.86.1433341498459; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.148.148 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 07:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:24:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5sfKawX15XqEbWjmOh=7gFKJV+65WnMYvsu+Yz+uGU0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "codematch-develop@ietf.org" <codematch-develop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d9889db8a7905179dd208"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codematch-develop/dw6g5_gk2XJSZzqSdzT0tn_Cefc>
Subject: [Codematch-develop] Review of mockups
X-BeenThere: codematch-develop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Discussion forum for the planning, coordination, and development of CodeMatch\"" <codematch-develop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codematch-develop/>
List-Post: <mailto:codematch-develop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:25:01 -0000

Hi,

In going through the text on the mock up pages, I have the following
questions:

1. CodeMatches page:
Under each text description, there is a line that starts with
"CodeRequests:" , should this be "CodeMatches"?  Or is this limited to
matches that are CodeRequests?

2. On the "CodeRequest.png", Resources is still spelled incorrectly.  I
think this may have been fixed already, so maybe the latest version is not
in the v4 folder.

3. On CodeRequest.png, if this is modeling a CodeRequest, shouldn't the
mentor, estimated level of effort, and difficulty level be listed as well?

4. CodeRequests.png looks like a different view than CodeRequest.png, but
also does not contain the mentor, estimated level of effort, and difficulty
level.

5. MyCodeMatchExample lists an example of a CodeMatch that includes one
that is a CodeRequest (mentor listed), but the level of effort is not
included.  Over time, I would suspect this would also have more of the
features from the feature list integrated.

I might not be looking at the most up-to-date mockups as I recall seeing
estimated level of effort included and know we were changing "popularity"
that was included for a brief period instead of reputation.  If someone
could point me to the most up-to-date set, I will review again prior to our
call.

Thank you,
Kathleen



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen