IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codesprints] Who knows about web browser caching?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 07 November 2010 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176363A6A17 for <codesprints@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 01:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WEIRD_PORT=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62TT2qPNothO for <codesprints@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 01:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B73E3A6A1D for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 01:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Nov 2010 08:47:54 -0000
Received: from p508FACCA.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.172.202] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 07 Nov 2010 09:47:54 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+amBdsYRaaFC7eby3wIk4m1Rl8v/wK/VRQS7u5BT /PsXGc2HDErC2Y
Message-ID: <4CD667B7.7050609@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:47:51 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.net>
References: <AANLkTinVeLeso2vttskPjTmeyqyzkFAB+KmeincJAN2m@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinVeLeso2vttskPjTmeyqyzkFAB+KmeincJAN2m@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: codesprints@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Who knows about web browser caching?
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codesprints>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:48:30 -0000

Bill,

you may want to test with redbot, see

 
<http://redbot.org/?uri=http://merlot.tools.ietf.org:31415/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-redirect/history/>

Also...
>
> I realize that the fact that the Etag varies here is going to be a
> problem (it's because the Etag is calculated after the gzip), but this
> is a separate problem.
>

...the etag is *supposed* to be different across varying 
content-encodings...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email