IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Coma] (no subject)

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: coma@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coma@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B8621F8716 for <coma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cPnVBs3sNJn5 for <coma@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6590D21F86F4 for <coma@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q5T9FIMC004364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:15:18 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC047.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.93]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q5T9FHQJ031542; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:15:17 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by DEMUEXC047.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:15:17 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:15:16 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6403F7F5E4@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120628151851.GD56180@elstar.local>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Coma] (no subject)
Thread-Index: Ac1VQVaY6w8eFDCmSRGWO8JpmJw/nAAlj4Tg
References: <00b101cd5508$22e90bd0$68bb2370$@cn> <20120628151851.GD56180@elstar.local>
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Yan Wang <ywang@cnnic.cn>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2012 09:15:17.0413 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3104550:01CD55D7]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 2606
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1340961318-00003CDD-2BF1E29C/0-0/0-0
Cc: coma@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Coma] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: coma@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coma.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coma>, <mailto:coma-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coma>
List-Post: <mailto:coma@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coma-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coma>, <mailto:coma-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:15:25 -0000

Hi Yan,

service management is a huge topic area and I assume we cannot cover it
exhaustively. IMO service management should be discussed as part of the
use cases. Based on this we need to understand the requirements on the
management of networks with constrained devices.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: coma-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:coma-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of ext
> Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 5:19 PM
> To: Yan Wang
> Cc: coma@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Coma] (no subject)
> 
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:29:29PM +0800, Yan Wang wrote:
> 
> > By the way,
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-guidance-00#section-4.5
mentioned
> > development of a light-weight SNMP agent for resource constrained
devices
> > running the 6LoWPAN/RPL protocol stack.
> 
> We have implemented an SNMP stack on Contiki and we have published
> details about it. I think I only very partially agree with what is
> written in this section 4.5. There is also an old expired I-D that
> might be relevant: <draft-hamid-6lowpan-snmp-optimizations-03.txt>
> 
> > What the relationship between coma and core, coma and lwig?
> 
> My understanding is that CORE is specifying CoAP. CoAP may be used for
> management but CORE is not chartered to specifically look at this
> question. LWIG is looking at coming up with general guidelines for
> light-weight implementations of IP protocols and hence might include
> guidelines for implementing SNMP. COMA probably can take a broader
> look at what is needed and in particular what the requirements driving
> things are. There is also discussion on the netconf WG list related to
> constrained devices, but it is as of now not chartered work.
> 
> I assume COMA is an attempt to provide a common place to discuss the
> management requirements and aspects of constrained networks and
> devices instead of having discussions in several places.
> 
> Of course, as Bert Wijnen kept saying, adding a protocol with the best
> intentions to replace other protocols just leads at the end to one
> more protocol. If that applies to discussion lists as well, then we
> just have one more. ;-)
> 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> Coma mailing list
> Coma@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coma

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email