[coman] Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Thu, 14 February 2013 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E920521F841F; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:11:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKbsScXNWf1G; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C13A21F8419; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r1EHBJ3v030681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:11:22 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.33]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r1EHBJKJ008880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:11:19 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC013.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.44) by DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.9; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:11:19 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.216]) by DEMUHTC013.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.44]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:11:19 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>, "lwig-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <lwig-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"
Thread-Index: Ac4K1k19fsSHyM+zSJKg/BwqfIncew==
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:11:18 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8021559@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.126]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1392
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1360861882-0000215D-9B6B866E/0-0/0-0
Cc: ext Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "ext Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Subject: [coman] Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:11:36 -0000

Hi All,

based on the agreement in the OPS-DIR meeting in IETF 83 and the support of the O&M AD Benoit Claise we set up the Coman (COnstrained MANanagement) activity and the corresponding maillist on May 16, 2012.

Since then quite a number of people worked on the document on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements" with their text contributions and comments. Many thanks to all who helped getting it to the current stage.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03

With this email we would like to start a review of the draft above.
Please provide your comments to any of the maillists on the Too-list (please CC Coman maillist).
We hope on a useful discussion concerning the problem statement, use cases and requirements.

As the next step, we decided during IETF 85 to provide a new draft with a gap analysis on missing standards at the IETF for the purpose of Constrained Device&Network Management with the goal to highlight new work at IETF. This draft will be written just after getting the above document more stable based on your comments.

Thank you in advance.

Cheers,
Mehmet

Coman maillist info:
List address: coman@ietf.org
Archive:   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman/
To subscribe:  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman