Re: [coman] New terminology section for LWIG and COMAN

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:57:35AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I have submitted a new version of the LWIG guidance document, with a
> new section 2 on terminology.  This tries to reflect the need for
> clearer terminology that became apparent in the discussion we had
> during the COMAN ad-hoc meeting at IETF 84. 
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-guidance-02#section-2
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-guidance-02
> 
> I'm looking forward to your comments.

This is useful, thanks for writing it down. 

I am not sure what the term "challenged network" really buys us. I did
not see the term "challenged network" actually used in RFC4838, but I
do understand that the DTN community used this term. My preference
would be to move the three bullets currently in 2.2.1 up to section
2.2. and to collapse 2.2.1 into a note that simply explains that the
term "challenged network" has been used for a certain subset of
constrained networks as part of the DTN work.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>