[Congress] Paul Wouters' Block on charter-ietf-congress-00-00: (with BLOCK)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 15 March 2023 16:04 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: congress-chairs@ietf.org, congress@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Message-ID: <167889625244.47962.8125467031023807266@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:04:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/3aJc1i6Zo4ssVkIlHd0Vi2cscpM>
Subject: [Congress] Paul Wouters' Block on charter-ietf-congress-00-00: (with BLOCK)

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-congress-00-00: Block

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-congress/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
BLOCK:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I see a lot of bullet points in the charter, but none of that matches up to the
milestones, which isn't a real milestone as it is 1 entry predicting when
everything should be completed. Can this be split up better?

I think the name "congress" is very misleading and will cause needless
confusion with being about venue / meeting issues. Can this still be changed?

[Congress] Paul Wouters' Block on charter-ietf-co… Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Re: [Congress] Paul Wouters' Block on charter-iet… Zaheduzzaman Sarker