[core] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-sid-16: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-core-sid-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support the DISCUSS positions of Ben Kaduk, Éric Vyncke, and Rob Wilton.

** YANG module.  Typo. “list assignment-range”.  s/the the/the/

** Appendix B.

Assignment of SIDs to YANG items can be automated, the recommended
   process to assign SIDs is as follows:

...
   4.  If the number of items exceeds the SID range(s) allocated to a
       YANG module, an extra range is added for subsequent assignments.

What’s the expected automated approach for adding extra ranges.  I was under
the impression that getting more SIDs required an IANA request to allocate them
them "YANG SID Range Registry"?