IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] draft-jennings-senml status and future

Wojciech Bober <wojciech.bober@gmail.com> Wed, 17 September 2014 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <wojciech.bober@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CA61A02D9 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QFP8mrrsaDco for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4355A1A0067 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id x12so1551896qac.16 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9f95eQDcr3ezWIF/T3smAlXr4gI09TM9C9ykvBsEYAY=; b=PhQqTFr9R4m6Kl0u1F1ls6QYn6SO3JElvjpbkmGxUqnNFO6XkJ9EcltQj3owql2xEb k9cmGRwNtZ4cbJNRzggjLE2eLriFgRN/nUfBN7VhlMQA5AIN7knwUwQidMUW/vV1F7Qg 0Ur+NHvZDr/CeXmXj3ZKT+goa8RP4ikjISmFSVuszHh4plShqXtXZ0OD7mJK/33CqJ4L MOp72dl4NhsA3mevjrzw0IGM7xfJpqEmIuiakCzZzIblS+5iuBch784N1BDdiZWLr4er ODg5KdwKiDaZmOnewSD4WqQw9WPPhJZKMapFUAVH+LJi9g7pmPE5qyemLe+VkjPmFb/a Yq9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.27.98 with SMTP id d62mr51542587yha.39.1410952244470; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.148.139 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <41CB40BC-B0B9-4F48-9557-12BDE9AADDE3@gmail.com>
References: <6A0F3A95-D1B7-4BAF-BF8D-BEB1DCA52DA4@gmail.com> <CADWJA9aukA-kaU4xdrcxhf2xEBhDSoydN7gtciaMptxSpGjm7Q@mail.gmail.com> <954628C5-A268-48A3-999E-7703410D33A7@piuha.net> <41CB40BC-B0B9-4F48-9557-12BDE9AADDE3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:10:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CADWJA9YKUxR-VtcP8apFU=DoW--WWD6herTw89EGqQZmYZxcbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wojciech Bober <wojciech.bober@gmail.com>
To: Alexandr Krylovskiy <alexandr.krylovskiy@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c1f1b053a9d2050340ebf5"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/1PBrWLfTFWUWRk6coVMFyKk_85Y
Cc: draft-jennings-senml@tools.ietf.org, core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] draft-jennings-senml status and future
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:10:52 -0000

I think what's missing from the draft is a section that defines an
efficient binary representation.

The last time I've checked there were some efforts to standarize msgpack
(as binpack). However I've found today that in the end CBOR standard has
been proposed and standarized [2], so probably that could be referenced.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049

-- 
Wojtek

2014-09-17 12:56 GMT+02:00 Alexandr Krylovskiy <
alexandr.krylovskiy@gmail.com>:

> For what it’s worth, I’ve found a typo in the spec:
> ‘bu’ should be defined as a string as described further in the text (see
> diff).
>
> It would be great to see the draft re-published and live on.
>
>
>
>
> On 12 Sep 2014, at 12:25, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
>
> > Zach, Cullen: I’d be ready to move forward, don’t think we need more
> data. Do you have something to wrap up and should we just publish the draft?
> >
> > JAri
> >
> > On 12 Sep 2014, at 11:06, Wojciech Bober <wojciech.bober@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm also interested in the status of this draft.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Wojciech Bober
> >>
> >> 2014-09-12 8:52 GMT+02:00 Alexandr Krylovskiy <
> alexandr.krylovskiy@gmail.com>:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am not very well familiar with the whole ietf standardisation process,
> >> but the latest SenML draft [1] has expired on 2013-04-25.
> >>
> >> I’ve found it being mentioned multiple times on the CoRE mailing list
> (e.g., [2])
> >> and seen it been used in several recent industry and research projects.
> >>
> >> What are the latest news/plans regarding the SenML?
> >> Are there any plans to re-submit a new draft?
> >>
> >> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-senml-10
> >> [2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/current/msg04045.html
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Alexandr
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> core mailing list
> >> core@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> >>
> >
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email