IETF Logo Mail Archive

[core] constrained resources at root for debugging connectivity

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 20 July 2021 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0743A230F; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7MMQZcPX3qq; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7463A230D; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFE938991; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TOQj9yZuOTym; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474643899E; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A201F1; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:39:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org
CC: core@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <AM8P190MB0979EBF594EA31877BFBED5DFDE29@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <AM8P190MB097901225CE72EF7973ADCC4FD139@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <AM8P190MB09791181A1D8F74ECDC6F04FFD129@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <d2da849f46f57a410d28f47d4ed32f97@bbhmail.nl> <AM8P190MB0979B2CB8DEDB7E9FDCF9C73FDE19@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <6b1b6fc38752b6f0598d4289c7cfeb31@bbhmail.nl> <AM8P190MB0979C689144DE6989C5D33E7FDE29@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <8c3348a5adb2b2c0d0a4b615cadc75a6@bbhmail.nl> <AM8P190MB0979EC82DA418ECF74440BA9FDE29@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <57da5e79b97eeca3967da119a60b0ed6@bbhmail.nl> <AM8P190MB0979EBF594EA31877BFBED5DFDE29@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:39:09 -0400
Message-ID: <18975.1626788349@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/4ualW_70DDOB55XuE4cRCODlLH8>
Subject: [core] constrained resources at root for debugging connectivity
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:39:21 -0000

It was said in a private exchange:
    > There is no CoAP resource at the root /  hence the 4.04.  (Only the
    > MASA has a test HTTP resource at / )

I thought, what we need is a CoAP Ping/echo.
And I remembered:
  https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-core-echo-request-tag-13.html#section-2.2

but, this is for the server to validate that the client is really there.

Should we recommend that Registrar put something at / that produces a 2.00?
(lowercase recommend)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email