[core] Review of draft-ietf-core-coral-03

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Mon, 08 June 2020 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5AB3A0990; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HbfhS9xB4fV8; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B7A3A0988; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:09:54 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: draft-ietf-core-coral@ietf.org
CC: core@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 20:09:52 -0700
Message-ID: <000001d63d42$4902bb60$db083220$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01D63D07.9CA4F4D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdY9CXST5sspF1wRTTKChY/JE+AXeg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/5uHyTXHTb1DpPVJpHejN2vllbcw>
Subject: [core] Review of draft-ietf-core-coral-03
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 03:10:21 -0000

Section 2.3 – Suggested text change s/are in contrast denoted/are, in contrast, denoted/  I keep thinking that by contrast should be used, but I keep going back and forth on that so I would leave that along.  If you go that it would be /types, by contrast, are denoted/

 

Section 2.3 – s/collisions when from different/collisions from/

 

Section 2.3 – The CBOR WG is defining two new tags for Date and TimeOfDay.  Should these be added as new literal values?

 

Section 2.3 – s/is neither identified by/is identified by neither/

 

Section 2.6 – Step 5 – Can the request method be a FETCH as well as a GET? 

 

Section 4.1.4 – I do not believe that expanding the MEDIAL character set is really a good idea.  Consider the following where one of the line uses HYPEN-MINUS and the other line uses ARMENIAN HYPEN.  I cannot see a difference if I am reading this.
#using AB-CD = IRI1
#using AB֊CD = IRI2

 

Section 4.1.5.3 – There is a difference between the text and the ABNF for hexadecimal.  One of them only has the lowercase character and the other has both upper- and lowercase ‘x’.

 

Section 5.2 – I am trying to figure out if not returning a CoRAL document is considered to be reasonable or not.  Does the phrase “processing result” indicate an absent content?

 

Section 5.2.1 – If I return a link to the new document created in a CoRAL document, should I also return the location options or should they be omitted?

 

Section 6.1.3 – I am wondering if an application might also require that the links and forms in a document be encoded in a specific order?

 

I skimmed the end of the document so I may do another pass on that section later.

 

Jim