Re: [core] RSSI in SenML

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 22 March 2017 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C09F129511 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byplSlPHYfRm for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA2B81289B0 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2MLsxRp005296; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:54:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vpNl754fqzDHfg; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:54:59 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170322203049.eswrtgjsatc67bw6@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:54:58 +0100
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, core <core@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511912498.802806-a4a06dee8ca98bc35f6eabcb4033eeda
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <37D02847-3B85-4C19-94E1-EDCEDF8A95C6@tzi.org>
References: <0A3A3346-9B5D-48B7-BB52-6DEE39A91200@iii.ca> <41989F03-35A9-4C76-9626-696FE123AFBC@tzi.org> <20170322203049.eswrtgjsatc67bw6@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
To: Christian Amsüss <c.amsuess@energyharvesting.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/6UY3uCmjb9hdXa_Re7Lo0dbIcYM>
Subject: Re: [core] RSSI in SenML
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:10 -0000

> On 22 Mar 2017, at 21:30, Christian Amsüss <c.amsuess@energyharvesting.at> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:52:14PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> RSSI is a quantity (an ill defined one).
>> 
>> Table 12.1 is about units.
> 
> By the name, but not by the use. The review guide after the table (esp.
> point 2) indicate that what is called unit in the document is what SI
> calls quantities, and the presence of Hz, 1/s and Bq shows that as well.

Hz, 1/s, Bq are units.

Quantities that can be expressed in these units are, for instance,

frequency, rotational frequency, activity,

respectively.

The principles are in ISO80000-1.  (Most of us got our degrees before 2009; I just wish students today would work more with these fundamentals…)
Look up the units and quantities given above in ISO80000-3 for Hz and 1/s (3-15.1 and 3-15.2 in the quantities table, 3-15.a and 3-15.b in the units table there).
I’m too lazy to look up Bq in ISO80000-10, oh well, it’s 10-29.a in the units table there.

> Maybe that should be clarified in the registry introduction; straw man
> text: "The definitions given here are called units based on common
> language use. In the terminology of the International System of Units,
> they are special unit names, and not only indicate the unit but also the
> described quantity.”

That would most definitely not be true with most entries of the current table.
Almost all are units in the SI or ISQ.
(Yes, there are some entries that are more on the quantity side of the spectrum.)

Grüße, Carsten