IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] RSSI in SenML

Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@filament.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44464128DF6 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=filament-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oqWxahZXq0E for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 880D61277BB for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l7so71035702ioe.3 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=filament-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f6sS117HX6Lw/iK/9WLcTKUvdaFlaMHS4yIP5lcRoGg=; b=wSPrdT+j6hFI+WLYK0XgCMi851uw7bH5jJOyUtGgYfL5hQN0rzbzy84SBelyUbuN1k sgANI/PU0iecXYJ8c++Tsg6XpO2WVuskWhuk138dtTzcp13V3SLd6M1ChFzQ62yamlCP hHB/PliCsvkwUkWwwINGTo4lpQ8oygewsvYonQw7bSk9nopNqhDf0yEvhg7eU1FYcuBP lmyZo/ZM8V3uk6IrEt5g5xYw2UPF7zOASOmPdhd2wV1b+EzJnEpX6XZyxsyaJnUzeIsv l0+ZPvemsEUZk5rz+AsL+5Ool8w2LWGvl9NseoAR8rTjOta7uS8mX+aB0KXj7UPn/Ume +NfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f6sS117HX6Lw/iK/9WLcTKUvdaFlaMHS4yIP5lcRoGg=; b=DFs7ky6kYMQomio6kBxSe6KjVIAbeubDrnYM3ttRF/hqoc4Dlnwq8XG78RN1kmwBkV 8cIcEhd+jsCguIrRjFAEbXEiD79j5bJ2lyB+7foO+z9krBY+s6UuAsTmTqBZ2dgjp0n3 e8HqoM8cRzaLn7KWWwuUr4NDDjNdor/PaRQ4aBxqsxJec4iGyDTsXBSgnDzFhiZE01YG D9F0qSzvxuhkjiqby4CUihbnxIKiiIh66zYHmaawCuo/mJl86Rvnixwhi/6r2T82Acxg mtYYn+Myzh8OAv2AXpUJTWqMDDpl58k7aJY2AmiKaUKKXYlqIdX3ucX2Ak05ICdNFr0i lxjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1Iq8YH0D3IwcStIDt1bB6oeIukjBnrqPiNbrpcZc8g6AZVUvdPpGfbVgy7PupWPw==
X-Received: by 10.107.32.83 with SMTP id g80mr37086121iog.234.1490213145851; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-98-245-40-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [98.245.40.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l33sm1289586iod.8.2017.03.22.13.05.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <0A3A3346-9B5D-48B7-BB52-6DEE39A91200@iii.ca> <41989F03-35A9-4C76-9626-696FE123AFBC@tzi.org> <b392ab95-81e5-7fbd-7a00-9a966b584762@filament.com> <531986DD-A870-4698-8EF1-D7129F931172@tzi.org>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, core <core@ietf.org>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com>
Message-ID: <0089bebc-0c11-155b-5a3e-4a9e99acb9bc@filament.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:05:44 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <531986DD-A870-4698-8EF1-D7129F931172@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Kz8OFdnmikR7VABVtp_WcAw6Yzs>
Subject: Re: [core] RSSI in SenML
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:05:49 -0000

On 3/22/17 12:59 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>
>> dBM is what I've seen.
>>
>>> But I don’t think
>>> there is any industry-wide way to do this.)
>>
>> If you know what device you're getting it from, does it matter that we
>> don't have an industry standard?
> 
> As long as you know that you don’t know...

Exactly.

> Maybe having a unit name for “device specific RSSI units” is fine.
> 
> Maybe adding dBm ("dB relative to 1 mW") would also not be a bad idea. 

WFM.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email