[core] Issue Tracking of Working Group Items

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 19 April 2016 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FFE12DBA0 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UE-_s2UVPjyp for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E869E12D99F for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.140] ([195.149.223.228]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNqcR-1apz1o2MSB-007RNv for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:48:07 +0200
To: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <57161AFB.5040804@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:48:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aI7W8E4OkPQJkr9rv0PdgjutWD3sRk1fa"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4P9i+m+3CxaVhRsh9kQj9rLkV0bWbf/E5c0m/dXF/2s8WeN+EcM BS1wtdRp98euoOcqcdx9yCmqnC0+GNHdUACHpe8SLQ7G9a0HE1z9LgOHfABwNoLag/D8Kk9 JgllduaCqJxO4ZrI+Vy8kBH6DEOD6Ks1A++5yYdv1VKEexJVFM471EGofaETGAswXUe6TJ8 OtoDVyT2qhoQS2QYWFlcw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qBZ83B7vOlg=:t77s1MFa6pZT+SkUisbfNt NAOqifh7H8JJutPlBHcF1V+pxjalL/c5ZEm+Hh4XvLU+7fV/ngY0YpSdtLZ2Sf46Ao9jcQPrE T8FV9voASrjJIPOaT3xC5fpAqhUhajoqBeRtvdeTMl9u9VnEC4Kj0JgmP0hvmxykkM6rEy+iR q3uxfMtONCBnGJyZXE9z5OmszJXv87rW9W4i6XH+0H3HvDo3A/qGnRbhaEwPdYqv7paNF0/Y3 iizwrS6L0UeiJyAfCm5qV+0yjGrF2NysEYiQFlgElZQuhGCxemMhkFhba566qn2n1Q10nj8dj MFrU7zNCgW0vK7AvMiKKRC25RhVnKNiYY1bDyNknsC2YMHtIbcsp0lAfFDwj0AXMknO1Wretz ONnFmIb/jemdnL9Maa2NmTLkXGL61RfmfHujtwpXaNIO0t7oWHaMpdlVRc+iaFBdSwMmuTTp1 XlEoNqgx2LbaTmpSrvot8PgqZoW+lvYLYcJGy1dKgF/RPYTRIecgkQa9Te3KfTF018q3v1LKr YLR33JyZ47hfdaanJnikeR7BGrgRd6CwGSIrc8MR2ACRhCJlXSRjTI+Ec27QMvLBYWvhM05/x 9pEb9cMy9sSYInd3Sz071p/4uDdbaE1OCX+h+3E9q7ZXsQkQLgTzO0wTfe709KXeXfFlOJ4rc T7ieXJYVbeR/PYoOd9atVAMPcFBaHJq91DrDfwuyRbrG2kEB/tb5QpiDODWb1asJz5OjVGsZL uZOcMs9TpN3j+lXgwnrjkGU0EwqNzQWpibJivrCvv25B6A72+tKe6eDybOA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/6eOT_WZN-DO2Vd4KvYJZBifICFA>
Subject: [core] Issue Tracking of Working Group Items
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:48:16 -0000

Hi all,

at the last IETF meeting we talked about the open issues with the
working group items and identified various issues that need to be
tackled with high priority.

The document editors wanted to add the open issues to the WG tracker.

I have just looked at the tracker at
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/core/trac/report/1 and, unfortunately,
nobody has added any issues.

If we indeed want to complete many of the WG items by the Berlin IETF
meeting then we should at least add the open issues to the tracker
before we can resolve them one-by-one.

It is not even clear to me who is in charge (editor) for each of the WG
documents.

If there isn't even enough energy by the authors to identify the open
issues and to add them to the tracker then the group is in trouble and
IMHO should definitely not adopt new WG documents.

Ciao
Hannes