IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-sid progress

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 04 September 2020 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CD93A1179 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVdrtZVxI8Z8 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB5C3A10C7 for <core@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BjWX525hWzyt0; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:47:33 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <31441.1599086507@localhost>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:47:27 +0200
Cc: core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 620902047.2626621-549fdc7549e03e19e9ce4f94e4d16353
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8D7B3828-F8E4-4099-A018-E49F9FB3E37A@tzi.org>
References: <31441.1599086507@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/CDI9dWIXbFXhQ7Z0xUG5Q4rz8wo>
Subject: Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-sid progress
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 08:47:38 -0000

Hi Michael,

On 2020-09-03, at 00:41, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> Hi, I think that all of the issues with ietf-core-sid have been dealt with.
> Can the document go through WGLC now, and advance?
> Along with draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-13, I think.

Those documents (the whole CoRECONF cluster) passed 2nd WGLC on Wednesday, 29th of July.
However, we got little in the way of actual reviews, or other feedback that the changes from the first WGLC are fine and do address the comments.
Maybe I have been a bit too feeble asking for this feedback in August; I was planning to get some feedback by mid-August (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/SeL1drwM3O3zgbzQb2Ltwj5Voy4).
It doesn’t help that I’m now mostly offline till 2020-09-09.
I’m planning to have the shepherd report available by Mid-September, so we can submit to the IESG.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email