Re: [core] SenML and its use in core-interfaces (follow-up on bn/n URI clarification)

[Ari Keränen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Christian,

Thanks for the update! If we want to have a call it should probably be US-friendly too, so late evening in Europe time zones. I'd suggest 16:00 CEST (7 AM PST) on 9th of May.


Cheers,
Ari

> On 02 May 2017, at 13:45, Christian Amsüss <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Cullen, hello Ari,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:07:11AM -0700, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>> I wonder why the senml in that draft can not have unique names in the
>> senml ?
> 
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:55:57PM +0000, Ari Keränen wrote:
>> OK, maybe we can have the call later then. Do you refer to Michael
>> Koster's HSML draft below or something else?
> 
> I've talked to Michael and Carsten piggy-backing on a resource-directory
> call, and it'd be OK with Michael (whom I perceive to be the most active
> core-interfaces author recently) if that went from using plain SenML to
> using HSML (moving this from "blocking SenML" to "will need to look at
> SenML extensions"); possibly, it could also move to CORAL, or the
> formats could even merge.
> 
> With that, the whole issue is probably not that pressing any more; I'd
> still be happy to discuss out the rationale behind using URI names and
> performance/scalability issues involved with it; if you're still
> interested, most (UTC+0200-viable) times on May 3rd or 8th to 10th would
> work fine for me.
> 
> Best regards
> Christian
> 
> -- 
> To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
>  -- Bene Gesserit axiom