Re: [core] Proposed new SenML Units

Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com> Mon, 09 November 2020 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30753A1143 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 07:43:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3mqImLrMVveN for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 07:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4FF3A113C for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 07:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id 10so8530195pfp.5 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 07:43:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Q9iTDFKYmNdXFaVqKnjP7fyzwzuflHCgkXl5a2DjQeo=; b=NLTr1PNbhyPRT/dgi5CLXYD+ncbRuz7IjQmMrn+04P6+jXRJG7apbM7oncJ41wXIi0 PJ18ZGjdAOFOi2uJyWFHAJ+rLLEoBjE1axcRX9InenvZFYBGXnEZDXDw8xXMg/C88t61 bZt4k0M70bG7XHyIiuepvZfzVO4WCNA6YboezsVY3pDtn9+E8DWiEasrFmfgvFWlk+QR vDjEATRDDGeXzdqkIeOAQ8q5gB2DX37MxCtkxgCRM4aUrHx7Z23QzgmcnyDhVJb4WlA8 Am2dp1dFFD5/kwbjtW74ah4dl9n+V5zEvnJLuO3gUZB3S2mkmkTk1/lFdOPvoyah8Sfb YFtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Q9iTDFKYmNdXFaVqKnjP7fyzwzuflHCgkXl5a2DjQeo=; b=DfY0vemWFiVtXERt+UWY5f3GDaEYdQ2gTy7R53r9J99s1fCSl6JSA/NQUVVB830e4j Ndg25TIUZsQwFxeYtJ26LFIRB9kWtHl7klluTDuHr0kGfezdgnks0txA3poBIvvYYd+W FwyR47qCsMp378YAsi5WRZav61as6mvtTdS5i4ILK7qNslpUWUzwCxEtfTUVn+Kkk/EP aNTZn3sFTFkudGuPecKlpyG0Se0JZs0ZczLHQIkD/80eSm3Ud+qK8u7qcBz0FhyE/OAu N5nm8xS0jzxlttDgwt003va8G05KUh6txARRNi08UWm3WFDZ7sT+tko10WSGnibC/wnq BlHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SPdx3tuvCaRWJrrc7I+TGzkr5HcN86eI69SksMx6moC9LkzWm 642L6EhHbeOsbNkeeSfbdFA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynHNgeBQdTqd7thx6eImWcbObRBKnG4CWOTafgOYFkr8Ye4A43FV7/InKyfKADY/AiTZ4Pdw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4814:: with SMTP id a20mr13566810pjh.163.1604936626026; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 07:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.0.11] (c-71-202-145-92.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [71.202.145.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x26sm11359646pfn.178.2020.11.09.07.43.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 07:43:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <041E8922-F467-430B-957C-6BB193D8352F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7E1AE1A0-2DF2-4BAE-A259-7A77D2D85014"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 07:43:42 -0800
In-Reply-To: <C164824A-C22E-4132-A240-C52D4D4B465B@tzi.org>
Cc: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, CoRE WG <core@ietf.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <20201109144145.nzp2oqiam7bdlqed@EMB-918HFH01> <C164824A-C22E-4132-A240-C52D4D4B465B@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/KGYHhMLNb_u6y9M0B6Q6J_FRlZM>
Subject: Re: [core] Proposed new SenML Units
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:43:48 -0000

> On Nov 9, 2020, at 7:12 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> +===========+================================+=======+
>> | Symbol    | Description                    | Type  |
>> +===========+================================+=======+
>> | NTU       | Nephelometric Turbidity Unit   | Float |
>> +-----------+--------------------------------+-------+
>> | mg/l      | milligrams per liter           | Float |
>> +-----------+--------------------------------+-------+
> 
> 
>> NTU is the most common way to measure turbidity.
> 
> This one is interesting.  There are several Turbidity units, which are not in a simple linear relationship, so I would like to get some input from domain experts which ones we should have (and which are more of a historical interest).
> 
> 

FWIW

While I'm not specifically a domain expert, I do have experience in a water turbidity measurement program.

I was responsible for process control and measurement systems in a large number of oil & gas installations in Alaska in the 1980s (please no "historical interest jokes...)

One of the installations was a water injection facility that needed to be accountable for the purity of the water injected into the ground over a period of decades. We maintained a fleet of "Surface-Scatter Turbidimeters" which measured turbidity in NTU. I was responsible for calibration of the machines and "certification" of the measurement record.

Turbidity is an indirect measure of suspended solids in water or other fluid, measured according of the amout of light blocked from transmission through the fluid. The Surface-Scatter Turbidimeter, or Nephelometer, measures the diffraction of light from surface roughness caused by the suspended solids. Standard solutions or cards (for field calibration) are used to calibrate the measurements.

A quick check on Wikipedia and discussion with an acquaintance who is a (retired) water treatment consultant (chemical salesman) confirms that NTU is still the metric of choice, though some facilities that know what their contaminants are can convert it to a concentration unit like ug/l for "internal" use.

Best regards,

Michael