Re: [core] KUDOS, PFS and operations considerations
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 17 November 2021 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6709F3A005C for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:59:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JijiVwi5QlRV for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD843A0062 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CD91801B for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:01:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NdD7o_ltuO8V for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6A11800C for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:01:48 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1637175708; bh=Bod+s5HzMmMeSdlw9JFjbhGA69x6t6ju5yBRZPNvAQc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=aPdlEoPppzB1Xi+SxfyASQzUrqn1BRrDJpicrRBAOo1SXeJTtaDXNI45T5SDjfg40 9ixWm64GT091K/QcNyIVw7PNb3ZbBEi0Yc1yLhdu1cap959/mp70AfnGeFGSH3w/sn u/40YR7pIHkIyZ++uckNy6+5T3cAPKp6aapKWhjI/Idac/le6d5eVEFTS5lx8LWx3+ cUXA6t7Re5lrqmmqGvt7jqnxs/zPShXExK4sw5RofzGbo0J4IdbIVEt9it3w0LC9Sw 3tDRpjsStR/YU9JTtMoqg0U6jK9OYBGSicctjH7fFSblGR4EhQSVGUBd5IRIbCWHT9 41IurkR59SrRw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9108D5 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:59:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: core@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:59:22 -0500
Message-ID: <24049.1637175562@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/KTGwZR3jYUyTqloTwh7MkDVzEZM>
Subject: Re: [core] KUDOS, PFS and operations considerations
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 18:59:33 -0000
Christian Ams=C3=BCss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote: > This is a conflict between two goals (provide PFS and enable stateless > operation) that I currently see no easy way out of (other than > introducing variants for either into the protocol) -- do you? maybe this is worth a two page lwig problem statement draft, and then a punt to CFRG for help? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [core] KUDOS, PFS and operations considerations Christian Amsüss
- Re: [core] KUDOS, PFS and operations consideratio… Michael Richardson
- Re: [core] KUDOS, PFS and operations consideratio… Göran Selander