Re: [core] [Anima] documenting SID usage in IETF specification

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 13 September 2018 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA8E130DE8 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3_HV2-mtlkW for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232491200D7 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742F720491 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:42:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 3DF984B4; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B4E44F for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Core <core@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHStLsAgVT9Lus-=A_DR+79+3vCjTuKc5aUJ-Hu099HR0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17342.1536697549@localhost> <622CDA79-7BE4-4A71-BFF7-0C80F63A1556@tzi.org> <CABCOCHTrjYZmK4e+L7pj=V=sWxg97jw2AFGen2PFe7ceBrB7bg@mail.gmail.com> <50f58c78b6825ce1cdbc33ea852c3145@bbhmail.nl> <84F58F84-4637-4D65-8F86-8E86B346528F@tzi.org> <CABCOCHStLsAgVT9Lus-=A_DR+79+3vCjTuKc5aUJ-Hu099HR0g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:23:27 -0400
Message-ID: <9031.1536852207@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Kmw56iE8HiquDkY8K3WC5d9Er34>
Subject: Re: [core] [Anima] documenting SID usage in IETF specification
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:23:30 -0000

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
    > - the module and SID assignments are not stable at all and MAY change
    > at any time in the future

any individual submission would be in this by default.

    > - the module and SID assignments are from an Implementation Draft and
    > SHOULD remain the same in future revisions

any WG adopted draft should be in this category.

    > - the module and SID assignments are from an RFC and MUST remain the
    > same in future revisions

Speaks for itself.

The questions is where are the SIDs allocated for the three different
categories?  Does it matter?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-