[core] Confirmable message
Ana Minaburo <ana@minaburo.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 08:42 UTC
Return-Path: <anaminaburo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396551294BE for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:42:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x2z2lYbMKAhP for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71DB129458 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id m124so95189090oif.1 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:42:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5G+65X7uc9yxQWvn8QVfFiTTlYM+vLCyc7zhktZK/cc=; b=JCqbLLHIsDXwFpLKlsHPgbMLQxp3GGXhhk8V8z/QXtWB9kCx3QIsCiyEr1TTXQfZdg BMS/Pzrm7nL21tegheJnlRfwh0ghEDV2NuZL3L5RSy7KvUTVXVSO69glbqy3/qjUMGSt FpZHEPBP2ngTwfVHX9TMpdMQ+iBRpYp/e973EUr11pB68tXzB11i8yy/LhoTdNZZ6VKY u51+/rgzPihKjv5tD2CXwjj0WknNPuoQhqn11WKPqtG7uMPrAIhPHsWDz9fhB2+o+qx8 JjwIfve+jWO8Yw67IvZp1YhWP+I+w2ivWg/utF7c0wvp7tzMKuygR+y3aORGIJ1vpbBB TYlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=5G+65X7uc9yxQWvn8QVfFiTTlYM+vLCyc7zhktZK/cc=; b=fUubTXo/txOpa9gK+Sayr/8GJKrzFn6ooDbExtf72rAxRUujXiNVRNb38om+cWjvrS E54GDjhqOxhOhDSdqVkzFir93K05zd0tNknQ+6icV8/PfaRjZqgnCi3Ia9EfmVEbOLbx X6cl4O7qWa6XFJVqcKNqPYr2IOaY3fPBkIVLH8v9yCMTGATe7Nw5+hB55reQdG/fqD3p d/m9fp6wVo7uikh8xc+WXfUwnMZS8JPOid7mMtpUUVGoE1NP/e9BsLX1iZ7yRuIcJtOV m7uUCKuoqJxnyS8nxr+jgRxL2sBtzob4lVlyLuna9F7vN8JyAPaGnc2cZahwE9l2ri7v mstg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKiP+8hhLEQSGhWp9c/cVkjgGDReF58LUV1CWrkZorKyzwU4DYdKKkmNdeD6ZFFCi/4wHqL3ypKUC1HSg==
X-Received: by 10.202.217.67 with SMTP id q64mr14333871oig.3.1485247349053; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:42:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: anaminaburo@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.68.131 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:42:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@minaburo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:42:08 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: bNJGrsaEhION6eZmD-TbB-7f4mA
Message-ID: <CAOPRf-f9mxjArhB0FLto32xXxKxrLnR=dKET+H+BtBrFRi+dEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Core <core@ietf.org>, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cf48ca4df070546d31813"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/OKtqkbi_lOzjYP0S3XJG5zjR1Mw>
Subject: [core] Confirmable message
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:42:31 -0000
Hi Peter In the draft, draft-vanderstok-core-comi-11.txt, you mention that a confirmable message is mandatory for carry CoMi requests. We understand that for setting a value it is necessary to be sure that the information has been correctly received. In LPWAN WG we are studying the way to compress header and reduce traffic on very constraint links. Do you think, it could be possible to suppress this constraint and allow the use of NON confirmable messages ? Thanks Ana
- [core] Confirmable message Ana Minaburo
- Re: [core] Confirmable message peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] Confirmable message Michel Veillette
- Re: [core] Confirmable message peter van der Stok