[core] draft-ietf-core-cocoa-01
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sat, 02 September 2017 18:22 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC3113301A for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fd1it8GRY4WE for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6CA133008 for <core@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.91.203] ([80.92.118.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MKHMk-1doklC1vk6-001g0d for <core@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 20:22:24 +0200
To: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <b20bb46a-26a6-9c43-e13f-d970c3095015@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 20:22:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hnQEHry0YiS22CiA7V5n/ZaTsCJWnHPmfVzG/WfhBuFd/X6t/42 Q1nxlai/x9BqILIQEerT2PHx+MY6WTjEC+hhNJwhu8uARLuGOdTFvHBRN2TpNGplgRCpZZ7 RNX80Yij4ioPADLf9/dJ6hPjnOVU55dbDrn7lcHTAdTnInnPQMQDKr/i3ZZ99UmtOsx+7wz B4H8lbIdeRCcQFEdh3Urg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:c08t5iqzAlk=:XB6NrbMG26IJt/mXVswopf CbPguQwYWgZwpkXJLMaXkA1ljoetsPis51Yg8TCb0v2ruEgUXwBcYbMsu5bdW2KgltQ6DDBsb luUnsqS0EJHJL9767Ns6ti8gRo12Rpyne/YzUMDhAw+cQRI4OjMB+3FWkQqe+2MMnJFcPGRaL cmb+sWKjIQSJRUkXNLZ3HVlwY3B4UxVK9j5AJhIEqbxfBYg7NC6giQ5K9g6SkQIPoYDuxLKMg +i2duUBzak5kr9Sb0U5Q1Wf23cqhCQJL0yzWcT3/QJjccZBQcQnETTyKuZrOLiAogef0Pw8PB GZyp3wASpCvoaygwLW8YJTG8Usdds52BinsQkf5mArUsfQ9lsw5kVWOBCxdaOqhF2FXg8350f dAHahSV98NdoOwymJrcNkZp1ZlhIf+IH6oJD+1Xr5zSelTIyTOLXUz6BUk3IqaCcvgZ/8shxl 5klZRue6QL9Ofosl8QYEGbgujEN4mN9YxRl5CYQfgnoUofrhP7XRh0ZgPoOB1qa23tEGFhueT lFvo+o6jEXWrUn2GiD/Ve8v8lyw7S/FpPb9EVg1xrQLT38CG7+feI52IiBEMpBqyC/fTb0d7U r3kI6l2dps7vIXUxhDw7n4zA/LsBj8f/2FxL/P2+Pm7+tZPvmryjyj1XiLwUvpP7h3VGxAXLB apJl2K9VdWnElql5nk9m7KSx3CnKQZwowydEHDYZbVdFB608Q3MXzpqGIjDWRMUM8kneA8ILC CSjgyfPJYBfKjwpm/U3FWDJgydsWtvEHtcz/jLDBKflEd7mTgnG4MWX8xZwCG8WOrRFsTkHv4 jNzwsb3aoAjdXzD+PjZ2z6UFWTTOvS5/Awv8ee/jYaPCWL6Feg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/PhyIqufNclo2d-P83_uTgLa3xzU>
Subject: [core] draft-ietf-core-cocoa-01
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 18:22:28 -0000
Hi draft-ietf-core-cocoa-01-authors, Hi all, I have started to read the CoAP congestion control document and I have a few comments. One of the most important sections of a document, the introduction section, is empty. As a reader I would find it useful * to learn what the perceived problem is, and * to have enough information to decide whether I want to implement this specification. Are there answers to these questions? I know that there are these other referenced documents that **may** contain some of that necessary content but do you expect the reader to read them to understand this document? I think this document has to be self-contained. I also believe that many readers are worried that the enhancements to CoAP over UDP quickly turn into CoAP over TCP. Are there suggestions on when a deployment should switch to CoAP over TCP rather than using CoAP over UDP with this advanced congestion control algorithm? Ciao Hannes
- [core] draft-ietf-core-cocoa-01 Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-cocoa-01 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-cocoa-01 Hannes Tschofenig