[core] stateless: pull request #11
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 30 September 2020 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942C93A0B38 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-YzHdHv3OPJ for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F17F3A0B50 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D061389EA for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UqBH9EOQfo2h for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841FC389E9 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3701D5 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: core@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <core-wg/stateless/issues/8/701025655@github.com>
References: <core-wg/stateless/issues/8@github.com> <core-wg/stateless/issues/8/701025655@github.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:44 -0400
Message-ID: <29293.1601483384@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Sc5BPTSWY_DWL9gH5uFh-B-7r7Q>
Subject: [core] stateless: pull request #11
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:30:17 -0000
I think that the reference to RFC4107(BCP107) is in error in my opinion. That document deals with systems like IKEv2/TLS/etc. The key in question never needs to leave the device. The key needs to be rotated, but there is really no need for more than a random number generated. The concern about the nonce-reuse is real. A sleep node that can not maintain a counter to make sure nonces are not reused could generate a new key during each wake cycle, if the responses are not expected to span sleep cycles. (Did the term "drowsy" get into some terminology document? I recall a discussion) https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/pull/11 -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [core] stateless: pull request #11 Michael Richardson