Re: [core] Content-Format vs. Parameters (Re: CoRE agenda @ IETF85)

[Yusuke DOI <[e-mail]>]

Carsten,

Thank you for arrangement!

Yusuke

(2012/10/27 1:35), Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2012, at 18:14, Yusuke DOI<[e-mail]>  wrote:
>
>> Carsten,
>>
>> if it's not too late, please let me introduce content-type parameter option in 5 min. talk. I'll be on the site.
>>
>> - Time: 5 min. for presentation, maybe another 5 min. for discussion?
>>   (I have no idea it's too long or short)
>> - Presenter: Yusuke DOI
>> - Objective: discussion on the content-type parameter proposal
>
> Certainly!
>
> I would like to structure this discussion into three items:
>
>          1) sanity check: Is what we are doing with Content-Format (coap-12's
>             name for what was Content-Type earlier) the right thing for the
>             majority of CoAP applications?
>
>          2) requirements: What are the applications we can't cover with
>             Content-Format?  What use-cases are behind them?
>
>          3) solution: is draft-doi-core-parameter-option the right solution
>             for these (some of these) use-cases?
>
> I think I can introduce 1, and I'd like you to do 2 and 3, with a focus on really making the case for 2.
>
> I'd like to allocate some 10 min for this.  If we get a good discussion about 1 and/or 2, we should be flexible about that.
>
> Updated agenda proposal is at:
>
> 	http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/agenda/agenda-85-core
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>