IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] [Anima] checking on advancing draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy / 'rt' naming

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 24 November 2021 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AEE3A08FF; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:49:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9GKb2uj7HcI; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E175F3A08F9; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (cpef81d0f835a73-cmf81d0f835a70.sdns.net.rogers.com [174.115.215.42]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7CC91F455; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:48:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 3F2BB1A0E37; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:48:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, core@ietf.org
cc: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
In-reply-to: <AM8P190MB09795402012270BDE6CD0327FD619@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <AM8P190MB09795402012270BDE6CD0327FD619@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Comments: In-reply-to Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> message dated "Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:32:03 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:48:56 -0500
Message-ID: <80674.1637776136@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/VrjsLymdQvCPBD0THJ2AGDrVgtM>
Subject: Re: [core] [Anima] checking on advancing draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy / 'rt' naming
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:49:07 -0000

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
    > I checked the new version against my review comments; and the following
    > comment is still open – this is where Peter and me disagree.

understood.
I have no real opinion.

    > core.* - CoRE WG types
    > ace.* - ACE WG types
    > brski.* - ANIMA WG types for BRSKI – not yet in the registry but specified in
    > draft-constrained-voucher.
    > oic.* - any types specified by OCF/OIC
    > fa.*  - any types specified by Fairhair Alliance

    > Hence my request to comply to this convention, however undocumented it
    > is today. Any system architect would agree to that seeing the current
    > list.

Can we ask core@ to review and comment then?

original message: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/s9yU6LPnV8pE17Ws2xjH2f0mrO0/


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email