IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-sid-22: (with COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 28 October 2023 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71256C151080; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qL16HEFIiEN; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7C4C14F747; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F01A1800E; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:25:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nW2d-oGi6ETO; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8261800C; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1698513933; bh=wZNnoGj0M7z+ZN2ibVHfG5jQkhC4QqcNrFlZ/A0vFjY=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=MQi+ao7Nxs+WvkvpBKo+FOXqpY5x2l5oqc4NwOxtwHA3CoOa2E1k1HTKs2GZyY5AN fjZ/UikitnXAiLhgNN5n8u7VdcskX0j6Gx0zyklmoSJ+fKZmo1OTjXZ8AeYrhHQELN iRNz8KCn5t06Auzm5e9dUHId4U8nm5bu29iPd6ihjTwnvNDhwj2DOkAn9gqvHyEWh6 1xxFDN3AHjnq7JoWIDZ0lWaA11bkj+NbZqW21csAmjhcTygc1+//70RcGIvoJz10xh UDJafWZ3xll0+R+QVXt75qOulI4+3QvoxL3UK1rwfDL5klumUVcD25j3UPHcHyIwn9 W5syBZg/heyew==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1D34D; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-sid@ietf.org, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaZNeUVg1tDzq5h3=Voh0h1Ad0P=JL-oh1WwBWJ8geTew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <169830425849.60370.8571387158946572818@ietfa.amsl.com> <21335.1698342868@localhost> <CAL0qLwaZNeUVg1tDzq5h3=Voh0h1Ad0P=JL-oh1WwBWJ8geTew@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:25:33 -0400
Message-ID: <5011.1698513933@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/W37f7LR57L9KmwuYOaZXP_1gq4M>
Subject: Re: [core] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-sid-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 17:25:42 -0000

Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> > * Sections 6.4 and 6.5 create registries that are going to be
    >> complicated for
    >> > the Designated Expert to work, and for the DE to present to the IESG
    >> proof that
    >> > the process was followed if asked.  I have to trust that all this
    >> complexity is
    >> > necessary.
    >>
    >> I'm not sure how we could simplify it.
    >> It doesn't seem that hard to me.
    >>

    > Well you've been part of its development.  I'm seeing it for the first time.


    >> I see your point that it might be difficult from the DE to assemble the
    >> right
    >> evidence if they haven't been thinking about filing that stuff ahead of
    >> time.
    >>

    > Is it worth advising the DE to keep some notes for a while?

That would seem to be a good plan.
My guess is that we'll see one or two SDOs, and one or two vendors ask for
a Mega Range in the next five years.
Is this something we should write into the advice?

    >> > * In 6.5.1, by "link", do you mean a URI?
    >>
    >> Yes.
    >>

    > I suggest saying so.

https://github.com/core-wg/yang-cbor/pull/166

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email