IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Agenda for IETF95

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 03 April 2016 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897B012D124 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRVZOVMT5SmT for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7553812D0DE for <core@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9a4a.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:152:1d73:b79a:1be2:ecb7]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D192A809B; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 01:08:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5701A26D.6050905@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 20:08:29 -0300
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
References: <57004973.3060903@tzi.org> <000901d18d40$b50ebb80$1f2c3280$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <000901d18d40$b50ebb80$1f2c3280$@augustcellars.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/XxoSp2V-7g2C9erbTUI5ccnZ7YM>
Cc: core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] Agenda for IETF95
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 23:08:38 -0000

I'd rather go to CFRG myself...

Yes, that conflict is a problem.  (Putting in CFRG only as a third-level
conflict was not so bright, sorry about that.)

Unfortunately, Friday is our longer slot.  If we move security to
Tuesday, most of the WG documents will need to go to Friday, and that
takes from the hallway time we may need to resolve tough issues on
things we want to ship soon.

So I think we should try to find the subset of the work that really
needs to be done on Tuesday (< 20 minutes) and leave the rest on Friday.

Stay tuned...

Grüße, Carsten


Jim Schaad wrote:
> Putting the security documents on Friday against CFRG is a good way of ensuring that some of the security people are going to be absent.  Me among them.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: core [mailto:core-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
>> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 7:37 PM
>> To: core@ietf.org WG <core@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [core] Agenda for IETF95
>>
>> The agenda that is on the github wiki now also is at the official place:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-core
>>
>> Presenters/discussion leaders: Please check the slots; please submit slides by
>> COB Sunday (or COB Wednesday if you cannot do this and your slot is on the
>> Friday).
>>
>> Grüße, Carsten
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> core mailing list
>> core@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email