Re: [core] Questions and comments against the github version
Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Tue, 11 December 2018 17:41 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD6130EC1; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Z10GbHZ_1WB; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1B1E130EB8; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:36:04 -0800
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
CC: draft-ietf-core-resource-directory@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
References: <02dd01d490f8$6aea0dc0$40be2940$@augustcellars.com> <d00ab991b089fb28625cb455ab7c5bec@bbhmail.nl>
In-Reply-To: <d00ab991b089fb28625cb455ab7c5bec@bbhmail.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:01 -0800
Message-ID: <035e01d49178$b08a3e60$119ebb20$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_035F_01D49135.A2688500"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMTxjR7df64heLt4gs0blLr1Spp0AE6nRS3ovGPqpA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/_T3D2BqjrSBBxaW-wBJjw0ozalQ>
Subject: Re: [core] Questions and comments against the github version
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:41:34 -0000
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 12:59 AM To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Cc: draft-ietf-core-resource-directory@ietf.org; core@ietf.org Subject: Re: Questions and comments against the github version Hi Jim, thanks, for the questions. One explanation for one question. Jim Schaad schreef op 2018-12-11 03:22: * In section 5.3, I don't understand why the rule exists that if the attribute values are different then the location of the registration needs to be changed. It seems that this could lead to some interesting conflicts in behavior depending on what messages are used. For example (content omitted for clarity): POST /rd?ep=e1&foo=over Res: 2.01 Created Location-Path: /rd/4001 POST /rd?ep=e1&foo=under Res: 2.01 Created Location-Path: /rd/4002 As opposed to: POST /rd?ep=e1&foo=over Res: 2.01 Created Location-Path: /rd/4001 POST /rd/4001?foo=under Res: 2.01 Changed <pvds> The feeling was that a first ep having done the earlier registration /rd/4001 should not be able to manipulate the 2nd registration by a 2nd ep, by removing /rd/4001 and having a registration /rd/4002 only known to 2nd ep. </pvds> [JLS] The only problem with this is that the query of endpoints needs to be changed so that the endpoint locations are not returned. Once the query is done then the location is known to a 2nd ep.
- [core] Questions and comments against the github … Jim Schaad
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Jim Schaad
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Lauri Piikivi
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Christian M. Amsüss
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Jim Schaad
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Christian M. Amsüss
- Re: [core] Questions and comments against the git… Christian Amsüss