Re: [core] WGLC on draft-ietf-core-dev-urn

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

> a Working Group last call on:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-04

I’m slightly confused, as the below items I raised 2020-01-27 don’t seem to have been addressed by a new version.  Sorry I missed this.  So consider these my WGLC comments.

Grüße, Carsten


...

here are a few quick observations:

# IDnits

Why are we still referencing RFC 2616, RFC 4627?

Is there anything in RFC 3406 that we need that is not in RFC 8141?
(3406 is cited as a normative reference alongside 8141, without further explanation.)

More importantly:
 ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5226 (Obsoleted by RFC 8126)

Oh, and

 == Outdated reference: draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn has been published
    as RFC 8464

# Section 2

Please use new BCP14 boilerplate (RFC 8174…).

# Section 3

Equivalence is case-sensitive, but the ABNF syntax allows all case variations (including within hexstring).
Where is "Note that the two subtypes defined in
          this document use only lower case letters, however.” substantiated?

I assume we don’t want leading zeros in `number` (behind ops, org, os)?

# Registration template

I haven’t crosschecked that with RFC 8141; I just assume someone did.

# typos, nits

expeced, justfied, assignemnts, preferrable
Two sentences ending in “, however” at end of page 5

Grüße, Carsten